Difference between revisions of "User talk:Peter Ellis"
Peter Ellis (talk | contribs) |
(Suggest mention injecting room) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I've listed *federal* parties. DLP is a state thing, as yet. See recent changes. :-) [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 00:04, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | :::I've listed *federal* parties. DLP is a state thing, as yet. See recent changes. :-) [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 00:04, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Uniting Church== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am not a member of the Uniting Church, but your article is excellent. I suppose the one thing that the church is known for in the wider community, that doesn't get a mention, is the Sydney injecting room. Clearly a controversial subject, but one I think would be interesting to get a run on this site as it demonstrates that the simplification that christian=conservative doesn't always hold by any means. Anyway, I felt it was "your" article so I wanted to leave you to decide whether you wanted to put such a potentially difficult comment on the page. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 18:14, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:14, May 25, 2007
love the changes (improvements) to the Australia page - it is turning into quite a good reference. Thankyou. Bit by bit we can build a wonderful resource on this great land. --Bilby 22:34, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- Lets! :-) Peter Ellis 22:40, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- Is the DLP still considered a party? They ran a few candidates in last year's Victorian election and nearly got one in. Not sure what its Federal status is - politics is not my area! Well, not party politics anyway.--Bilby 23:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- I've listed *federal* parties. DLP is a state thing, as yet. See recent changes. :-) Peter Ellis 00:04, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
Uniting Church
I am not a member of the Uniting Church, but your article is excellent. I suppose the one thing that the church is known for in the wider community, that doesn't get a mention, is the Sydney injecting room. Clearly a controversial subject, but one I think would be interesting to get a run on this site as it demonstrates that the simplification that christian=conservative doesn't always hold by any means. Anyway, I felt it was "your" article so I wanted to leave you to decide whether you wanted to put such a potentially difficult comment on the page. Ferret 18:14, 25 May 2007 (EDT)