Difference between revisions of "User talk:MountainDew"
(thanks for your entry on Thoreau - I enjoyed it) |
MountainDew (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Nice entry on Henry David Thoreau! Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:16, 2 March 2007 (EST) | Nice entry on Henry David Thoreau! Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:16, 2 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks. I hope to expand on it eventually. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:32, 5 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 07:32, March 5, 2007
Question: What did I do wrong in the entry for God? It is a fact that all three of those religions worship the same god. They worship different prophets(Islam has Mohammed, Christianity has Jesus and Judaism believes that the son of god hasn't arrived yet), but they do all believe in the same god.
Sorry if this is in the wrong spot, I just didn't know how to send you a message.
Due to your excellent contributions to Conservapedia, you have been made a SYSOP. With these new privileges, you can block any troublesome users by clicking the block button next to their username. You can also revert vandalism using the method described here. Please block users guilty of minor vandalism for a short period of time, such as a week or two. Obscenity and Offensive edits are reason for an infinite block without warning. Congratulations on becoming a SYSOP! ~ SharonS 20:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)
Your welcome! ~ SharonS 20:43, 25 February 2007 (EST)
Explaining reversions
When reverting as you did here, it is generally helpful to explain why you choose to revert. JoshuaZ 17:17, 1 March 2007 (EST)
I'll do that in the future. The user in question was obviously trying to be snarky, but that's nothing I couldn't have specified. MountainDew 17:27, 1 March 2007 (EST)
- It didn't strike me as snarky. It seemed to me to be highly reasonable especially since there issues when we use the term "creationist" precisely what we mean, whether YEC or some other form. This is discussed briefly at creationism. Regardless, it doesn't make much sense to say someone was in a category when everyone in their time period was in that category. It would be like labeling Julius Caesar pagan. JoshuaZ 17:32, 1 March 2007 (EST)
- I would dispute whether everybody was a creationist in 1841, but I don't think this is really worth arguing over, so if you wish to revert it back, feel free. MountainDew 17:35, 1 March 2007 (EST)
Good entry!
Nice entry on Henry David Thoreau! Thanks!--Aschlafly 15:16, 2 March 2007 (EST)
Thanks. I hope to expand on it eventually. MountainDew 02:32, 5 March 2007 (EST)