Difference between revisions of "Schrödinger's Cat"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(An implication of this principle of quantum mechanics is that the Resurrection is entirely possible, similar to how quantum tunneling works despite violating traditional laws of physics.)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
+
[[Image:Schrodcat01.JPG|right|thumb|300px]]
 +
'''Schrödinger's cat''' is a thought experiment that illustrates a paradox associated with the [[principle of superposition]] in [[quantum mechanics]], it was proposed by [[Erwin Schrödinger]] in 1935. Schrödinger's cat serves to demonstrate the apparent conflict between what quantum theory tells us is true about the nature and behavior of matter on the microscopic level and what we observe to be true about the nature and behavior of matter on the macroscopic level.
  
'''Schrödinger's cat''' is a famous [[thought experiment]] originally described by physicist [[Erwin Schrödinger]]. It is created in response to a debate with [[Albert Einstein]] about the reality of the [[Copenhagen interpretation]] of [[quantum mechanics]]. The paradox arises from issues of extrapolating quantum effects to macroscopic systems.  
+
An implication of this principle of quantum mechanics is that the [[Resurrection]] is entirely possible, similar to how [[quantum tunneling]] works despite violating traditional laws of [[physics]].
  
The experiment is usually described as follows:
+
==The Thought Experiment==
  
A cat is completely isolated in a box, no information travels into or out of the box. A detector is set up to detect whether a single electron is on one side of the box or the other. If it detects it on a particular side a poison is released killing the cat, if it is on the opposite side then the poison is not released and the cat lives. Since the system is isolated it exist in a state of [[superposition]] where the electron is in both places at once. This essentially means that the cat is both dead and alive at the same time.
+
In a paper entitled ''The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics'', Schroedinger wrote the following:
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>
 +
One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.<ref>http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/QM/cat.html#sect5</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
==Explanation/Interpretations==
 +
 
 +
In lay terms, Schrödinger's experiment results in a paradox: According to the quantum mechanical model, because the cat's "live-ness" is not being measured directly, there is no way to know whether or not it is alive or not. As a matter of fact, quantum mechanics dictates that ''it is existing in both states simultaneously.'' Such behavior is not encountered in daily life, but is accepted as possible behavior for subatomic particles.
 +
 
 +
There are two primary interpretations of the theory: the Copenhagen interpretation and the many-worlds interpretation.
 +
 
 +
===Copenhagen Interpretation===
 +
 
 +
The Copenhagen interpretation is the interpretation dealing fundamentally with [[decoherence]]. Because quantum mechanics is a statistical method of describing the physical world, there are multiple states that a system can exist in at the same time; this is the principle of [[superposition]]. A quantum system is said to always be in a state of superposition until the system is measured, at which point the system ''decoheres'' and assumes a unique value. Such behavior has been the basis of revolutionary research into computing technologies (see [[quantum computer]]). This interpretation also questions at what time the "measuring" of the system takes place; for instance, a fundamental aspect of the system is measured when a nucleus decays and the event is recorded by the [[Geiger counter]].<ref name="Layman">http://www.higgo.com/quantum/laymans.htm</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Many-worlds Interpretation===
 +
 
 +
The many-worlds interpretation deals with the concept that measuring the system is not a significant act. Instead, both states exist simultaneously, but are decoherent with each other, meaning that there is no communication between them. When the system is observed or measured (the box opened), the observer becomes [[quantum entanglement|entangled]] with the system, and essentially, two new observer states are formed - an observer who discovers a dead cat, and an observer who discovers a living cat. At this point, the [[universe]] "splits" into two branches or separate universes that are unable to communicate with each other.<ref name="Layman"/><ref>Interpreting Quantum Physics James Higgo 1968-2001 [http://www.higgo.com/quantum]/</ref>
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
 
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Maxwell's demon]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Quantum Mechanics]]

Latest revision as of 01:47, April 24, 2022

Schrodcat01.JPG

Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment that illustrates a paradox associated with the principle of superposition in quantum mechanics, it was proposed by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. Schrödinger's cat serves to demonstrate the apparent conflict between what quantum theory tells us is true about the nature and behavior of matter on the microscopic level and what we observe to be true about the nature and behavior of matter on the macroscopic level.

An implication of this principle of quantum mechanics is that the Resurrection is entirely possible, similar to how quantum tunneling works despite violating traditional laws of physics.

The Thought Experiment

In a paper entitled The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics, Schroedinger wrote the following:

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.[1]

Explanation/Interpretations

In lay terms, Schrödinger's experiment results in a paradox: According to the quantum mechanical model, because the cat's "live-ness" is not being measured directly, there is no way to know whether or not it is alive or not. As a matter of fact, quantum mechanics dictates that it is existing in both states simultaneously. Such behavior is not encountered in daily life, but is accepted as possible behavior for subatomic particles.

There are two primary interpretations of the theory: the Copenhagen interpretation and the many-worlds interpretation.

Copenhagen Interpretation

The Copenhagen interpretation is the interpretation dealing fundamentally with decoherence. Because quantum mechanics is a statistical method of describing the physical world, there are multiple states that a system can exist in at the same time; this is the principle of superposition. A quantum system is said to always be in a state of superposition until the system is measured, at which point the system decoheres and assumes a unique value. Such behavior has been the basis of revolutionary research into computing technologies (see quantum computer). This interpretation also questions at what time the "measuring" of the system takes place; for instance, a fundamental aspect of the system is measured when a nucleus decays and the event is recorded by the Geiger counter.[2]

Many-worlds Interpretation

The many-worlds interpretation deals with the concept that measuring the system is not a significant act. Instead, both states exist simultaneously, but are decoherent with each other, meaning that there is no communication between them. When the system is observed or measured (the box opened), the observer becomes entangled with the system, and essentially, two new observer states are formed - an observer who discovers a dead cat, and an observer who discovers a living cat. At this point, the universe "splits" into two branches or separate universes that are unable to communicate with each other.[2][3]

References

See also