Difference between revisions of "Talk:Absolute monarchy"
From Conservapedia
(King John Was Not An Absolute Monarch) |
(Wasn't his rule so authoritarian that the Magna Carta was a rebellion against it?) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I do not want to leave it as is, and do think an example of a bad Absolute Monarch should be Included. But, King John was not an Absolute Monarch. | I do not want to leave it as is, and do think an example of a bad Absolute Monarch should be Included. But, King John was not an Absolute Monarch. | ||
[[User:SKWills|SKWills]] ([[User talk:SKWills|talk]]) 01:16, June 24, 2022 (EDT) | [[User:SKWills|SKWills]] ([[User talk:SKWills|talk]]) 01:16, June 24, 2022 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Wasn't his rule so authoritarian that the [[Magna Carta]] was a rebellion against it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:23, June 24, 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:23, June 24, 2022
"An absolute monarchy is a country that is ruled by a hereditary monarch, with little or no democratic or other forms of limitation to his powers. " An example for an absolute monarchy in Europe is the Vatican City, where the monarch, i.e. the pope is elected... So, being hereditary isn't necessary for the existence of an absolute monarchy. DiEb 12:12, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
I do not want to leave it as is, and do think an example of a bad Absolute Monarch should be Included. But, King John was not an Absolute Monarch. SKWills (talk) 01:16, June 24, 2022 (EDT)
- Wasn't his rule so authoritarian that the Magna Carta was a rebellion against it?--Andy Schlafly (talk) 01:23, June 24, 2022 (EDT)
