Difference between revisions of "Administrative law standing cases"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85 (2013)  
 
*Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85 (2013)  
 
*Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40 (1999)  
 
*Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40 (1999)  
−
*Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)  
+
*''Ashcroft v. Iqbal'', 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (“plausibility” standard for pleadings “asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully”)
 
*Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Schiff, 518 F. Supp. 3d 505 (D.D.C. 2021)  
 
*Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Schiff, 518 F. Supp. 3d 505 (D.D.C. 2021)  
 
*Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Schiff, 23 F.4th 1028 (D.C. Cir. 2022)  
 
*Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Schiff, 23 F.4th 1028 (D.C. Cir. 2022)  

Revision as of 00:49, October 23, 2022

Administrative law standing cases include the following 50 precedents:

  • Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984)
  • Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U.S. 85 (2013)
  • Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40 (1999)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (“plausibility” standard for pleadings “asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully”)
  • Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Schiff, 518 F. Supp. 3d 505 (D.D.C. 2021)
  • Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. Schiff, 23 F.4th 1028 (D.C. Cir. 2022)
  • Barnes v. Lehman, 861 F.2d 1383, 1387 (5th Cir. 1988) (regulations “do not convert private action into state action” even when the regulation “dictate[s] procedures, forms, or even penalties without dictating the challenged action”)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007) (a complaint must allege “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face”)
  • Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991, 1004 (1982) (government “normally can be held responsible for a private decision only when it has exercised coercive power or has provided such significant encouragement, either overt or covert, that the choice must in law be deemed to be that of the State”)
  • Cargill, Inc. v. United States, 173 F.3d 323 (5th Cir. 1999)
  • Changizi v. Dep’t of Health and Hum. Servs., No. 2:22-cv-1776, 2022 WL 1423176 (S.D. Ohio May 5, 2022), appeal filed, No. 2:22-cv-1776, 2022 WL 1423176 (6th Cir. June 30, 2022)
  • Children’s Health Def. v. Facebook, 546 F. Supp. 3d 909 (N.D. Cal. 2021)
  • Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA, 568 U.S. 398 (2013)
  • Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Tidwell, 239 F. Supp. 3d 213 (D.D.C. 2017)
  • Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood Village, Cal., 333 U.S. 426 (1948)
  • Elec. Priv. Info. Ctr. v. Drone Advisory Comm., 995 F.3d 993 (D.C. Cir. 2021)
  • Empower Texans, Inc. v. Geren, 977 F.3d 367 (5th Cir. 2020)
  • Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Env’t Servs. (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167 (2000)
  • Hart v. Facebook, No. 22-cv-00737, 2022 WL 1427507 (N.D. Cal. May 5, 2022)
  • Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 317 (1988) (limits federal adjudication to “actual, ongoing controversies”)
  • Hooks v. Landmark Indus., 797 F.3d 309 (5th Cir. 2015)
  • Huber v. Biden, No. 21-cv-06580, 2022 WL 827248 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2022) (dismissing a claim of conspiracy between President Biden and Twitter to violate First Amendment rights)
  • In re S. Recycling, 982 F.3d 374 (5th Cir. 2020)
  • Info. Ctr. v. Drone Advisory Comm., 995 F.3d 993 (D.C. Cir. 2021)
  • Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974)
  • Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components, 572 U.S. 118 (2014)
  • Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U.S. 551 (1972)
  • Lugar v. Edmondson Oil, 457 U.S. 922 (1982)
  • Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)
  • Manax v. McNamara, 842 F.2d 808 (5th Cir. 1988)
  • McCormack v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 845 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1988)
  • Morgan v. Medtronic, 172 F. Supp. 3d 959 (S.D. Tex. 2016)
  • Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Tarkanian, 488 U.S. 179 (1988)
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. City of New York, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (2020)
  • Norris v. Hearst Tr., 500 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2007)
  • Pub. Citizen v. Nat’l Advisory Comm. on Microbiological Criteria for Foods, 886 F.2d 419 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
  • Pub. Citizen v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 491 U.S. 440 (1989)
  • Randall D. Wolcott, M.D., P.A. v. Sebelius, 635 F.3d 757 (5th Cir. 2011)
  • Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 (1982)
  • Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312 (1991)
  • Roberts v. Louisiana Downs, 742 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1984)
  • Soc’y of Separationists v. Herman, 959 F.2d 1283 (5th Cir. 1992)
  • Sossamon v. Lone Star State of Texas, 560 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2009)
  • Sossamon v. Texas, 563 U.S. 277 (2011)
  • Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016)
  • Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488 (2009)
  • Transunion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190 (2021)
  • Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, 576 U.S. 200 (2015)
  • Watts v. Northside Indep. Sch. Dist., 37 F.4th 1094 (5th Cir. 2022)
  • West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)
  • Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990)

Holding against standing