Difference between revisions of "First Amendment standing cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{cquote|Though the requirements of standing are somewhat "relaxed in the First-Amendment context," standing is relaxed "only as relating to the various court-imposed prudenti...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 04:00, November 2, 2022
| “ | Though the requirements of standing are somewhat "relaxed in the First-Amendment context," standing is relaxed "only as relating to the various court-imposed prudential requirements of standing." Seals v. McBee, 898 F.3d 587, 591 (5th Cir. 2018). Even in the First-Amendment context, plaintiffs "still must show that they satisfy the core Article III requirements of injury, causation, and redressability." Id. Here, two theories of standing are relevant: individual and associational standing. | ” |
Speech First, Inc. v. Fenves, 384 F. Supp. 3d 732, 739 (W.D. Tex. 2019).