Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hakeem Jeffries"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Hakeem Jeffries is the guy who in only the third Senate impeachment trial of a U.S. president in the country's 230 year history, repeatedly referred to [[Shokin]] as "the corrupt prosecutor", asking us to accept his word as evidence on faith, giving Shokin no opportunity to refute the charge or defend himself.  No evidence had been resent in the [[House]] investigatory proceedings that Shokin was corrupt. The [[Burisam]] question was nevr even looked into.  Hence for two years now, I have freely used the same rhetorical device, labelling anyone I don't like for partisan reasons as "corrupt", which now has been confirmed as acceptable, and will be expanded, with the corrupt Democrats ratifying the use of demagoguery with Jeffries election as leader. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:28, December 2, 2022 (EST)
+
Hakeem Jeffries is the guy who in only the third Senate impeachment trial of a U.S. president in the country's 230 year history, repeatedly referred to [[Shokin]] as "the corrupt prosecutor", asking us to accept his word as evidence on faith, giving Shokin no opportunity to refute the charge or defend himself.  No evidence had been resent in the [[House]] investigatory proceedings that Shokin was corrupt. The [[Burisma]] question was never even looked into.  Hence for two years now, I have freely used the same rhetorical device, labelling anyone I don't like for partisan reasons as "corrupt", which now has been confirmed as acceptable, and will be expanded, with the corrupt Democrats ratifying the use of demagoguery with Jeffries election as leader. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:28, December 2, 2022 (EST)

Revision as of 19:34, December 2, 2022

Hakeem Jeffries is the guy who in only the third Senate impeachment trial of a U.S. president in the country's 230 year history, repeatedly referred to Shokin as "the corrupt prosecutor", asking us to accept his word as evidence on faith, giving Shokin no opportunity to refute the charge or defend himself. No evidence had been resent in the House investigatory proceedings that Shokin was corrupt. The Burisma question was never even looked into. Hence for two years now, I have freely used the same rhetorical device, labelling anyone I don't like for partisan reasons as "corrupt", which now has been confirmed as acceptable, and will be expanded, with the corrupt Democrats ratifying the use of demagoguery with Jeffries election as leader. RobSGive Peace a chance 14:28, December 2, 2022 (EST)