Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aramaic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I thought they called that vandalism. ALL his edits are garbage (ok, except one) --[[User:Stunned Amazement|Stunned Amazement]] 16:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I thought they called that vandalism. ALL his edits are garbage (ok, except one) --[[User:Stunned Amazement|Stunned Amazement]] 16:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Wikipedia mealy invented names since the 1980s or so==
 +
Wikipedia includes "sources" from modern writers with new invented names/titles. In truth, the Talmud Yerushalmi - was always called that, ''Jerusalem Talmud''. Full stop.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 03:38, December 30, 2022 (EST)

Revision as of 08:38, December 30, 2022

Mallory's book does not mention Aramaic anywhere. So this unlikely piece of info is supported by a fake source. What's your game, Kiowa?

What is the point of making up fake encyclopedia articles, unless it is a joke?

I thought they called that vandalism. ALL his edits are garbage (ok, except one) --Stunned Amazement 16:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Wikipedia mealy invented names since the 1980s or so

Wikipedia includes "sources" from modern writers with new invented names/titles. In truth, the Talmud Yerushalmi - was always called that, Jerusalem Talmud. Full stop.Telling (talk) 03:38, December 30, 2022 (EST)