Difference between revisions of "FDA cases"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''FDA cases''' are decisions relied on by the Food and Drug Administration in defending a legal challenge to its interference with the use of ivermectin during COVI...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:00, March 12, 2023

FDA cases are decisions relied on by the Food and Drug Administration in defending a legal challenge to its interference with the use of ivermectin during COVID-19:

  • Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Tex. v. United States, 757 F.3d 484 (5th Cir. 2014)
  • Alabama Rural Fire Ins. Co. v. Naylor, 530 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir. 1976)
  • Association of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. FDA, 13 F.4th 531 (6th Cir. 2021)
  • Avoyelles Sportsmen’s League v. Marsh, 715 F.2d 897 (5th Cir. 1983)
  • Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 (1959)
  • Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (1997)
  • Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs’ Legal Comm., 531 U.S. 341 (2001)
  • California v. Texas, 141 S. Ct. 2104 (2021)
  • Cuvillier v. Taylor, 503 F.3d 397 (5th Cir. 2007)
  • Dalton v. Specter, 511 U.S. 462 (1994)
  • Danos v. Jones, 652 F.3d 577 (5th Cir. 2011)
  • Data Mktg. P’ship, LP v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 45 F.4th 846 (5th Cir. 2022)
  • Daves v. Dallas County, 22 F.4th 522 (5th Cir. 2022)
  • FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000)
  • Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471 (1994)
  • Flue-Cured Tobacco Coop. Stabilization Corp. v. EPA, 313 F.3d 852 (4th Cir. 2002)
  • Franklin v. Massachusetts, 505 U.S. 788 (1992)
  • Geyen v. Marsh, 775 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1985)
  • Hoxsey v. Folsom, 155 F. Supp. 376 (D.D.C. 1957)
  • Independent Equip. Dealers Ass’n v. EPA, 372 F.3d 420 (D.C. Cir. 2004)
  • Invention Submission Corp. v. Rogan, 357 F.3d 452 (4th Cir. 2004)
  • June Med. Servs. LLC v. Russo, 140 S. Ct. 2103 (2020)
  • Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125 (2004)
  • Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp., 337 U.S. 682 (1949)
  • Louisiana v. United States, 948 F.3d 317 (5th Cir. 2020)
  • Louisiana v. U.S. Army Corp of Eng’rs, 834 F.3d 574 (5th Cir. 2016)
  • Lujan v. National Wildlife Fed’n, 497 U.S. 871 (1990)
  • Medical Mut. of Ohio v. AbbVie Inc., 784 F. App’x 457 (7th Cir. 2019)
  • Parsons v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 878 F.3d 162 (6th Cir. 2017)
  • Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984)
  • Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Aisen, No. 15-cv-1766, 2016 WL 1428072 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2016)
  • Shurtleff v. City of Boston, 142 S. Ct. 1583 (2022)
  • Sierra Club v. Peterson, 228 F.3d 559 (5th Cir. 2000)
  • Sprint Nextel Corp. v. FCC, 508 F.3d 1129 (D.C. Cir. 2007)
  • St. Tammany Par., ex rel. Davis v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 556 F.3d 307 (5th Cir. 2009)
  • Texas v. Biden, 10 F.4th 538 (5th Cir. 2021)
  • Texas v. EEOC, 933 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2019)
  • Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A.,140 S. Ct. 1615 (2020)
  • States ex rel. King v. Solvay Pharm., Inc., 871 F.3d 318 (5th Cir. 2017)
  • Vote.Org v. Callanen, 39 F.4th 297 (5th Cir. 2022)
  • Walmart v. DOJ, 21 F.4th 300 (5th Cir. 2021)