Difference between revisions of "Lessons from retranslated Gospel of Mark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(... and humorous) |
(include a realization that like Shakespeare's works, the Gospel of Mark has subtle humor and cleverness greater than its simplicity of wording.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Lessons learned from retranslated Gospel of Mark''' include: | + | '''Lessons learned from retranslated Gospel of Mark''' include a realization that like [[Shakespeare]]'s works, the [[Gospel of Mark]] has subtle humor and cleverness greater than its simplicity of wording. These include: |
*English translations fail to be as strong against [[addiction]] as the original: | *English translations fail to be as strong against [[addiction]] as the original: | ||
Revision as of 05:02, April 24, 2023
Lessons learned from retranslated Gospel of Mark include a realization that like Shakespeare's works, the Gospel of Mark has subtle humor and cleverness greater than its simplicity of wording. These include:
- English translations fail to be as strong against addiction as the original:
- the original Gospel of Mark has an intriguing ending where the women told no "man" of what they found at the empty tomb after the Resurrection
- the withering of the fig tree is recounted in a dramatic, captivating, and humorous way
- the Multiplication of the loaves is recounted twice in a dramatic manner
- reinforcing the likelihood that Salome was the mother of Mark, he explains that Salome's group purchased spices for Jesus in Mark 16:1
- Mark artfully explains how faith can cause action at Mark 11:23: "that man's words will become true," providing a glimpse similar to the Ontological argument to prove the existence of God.
See also
References
| |||||