Difference between revisions of "Lessons from retranslated Gospel of Mark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Mark's criticisms of the older Apostles are witty) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Lessons learned from retranslated Gospel of Mark''' include a realization that like [[Shakespeare]]'s works, the [[Gospel of Mark]] has subtle humor and cleverness greater than its simplicity of wording. | + | '''Lessons learned from retranslated Gospel of Mark''' include a realization that like [[Shakespeare]]'s works, the [[Gospel of Mark]] has subtle humor and cleverness greater than its simplicity of wording. Reading the Gospel of Mark straight through, without verse numbers and in modern terminology, is a wonderful experience. |
| + | |||
| + | New lessons learned include: | ||
*the withering of the fig tree is recounted in a very clever, dramatic, captivating, and humorous way | *the withering of the fig tree is recounted in a very clever, dramatic, captivating, and humorous way | ||
| − | *Mark's criticisms of the older [[Apostles]] are witty | + | *Mark's sharp criticisms as a teenager of the older, adult [[Apostles]] are witty |
*Mark's multiple references apparently to himself are remarkably subtle, such as Jesus's Apostles finding a boy who had a little food | *Mark's multiple references apparently to himself are remarkably subtle, such as Jesus's Apostles finding a boy who had a little food | ||
| + | *the original [[Gospel of Mark]] has an intriguing ending where the women told no "man" of what they found at the empty tomb after the [[Resurrection]], as though only Salome told his young son Mark | ||
*English translations fail to be as strong against [[addiction]] as the original: | *English translations fail to be as strong against [[addiction]] as the original: | ||
:*nearly all [[English]] translations omit the disparaging reference to [[gambling]], by calling it the archaic "casting lots" | :*nearly all [[English]] translations omit the disparaging reference to [[gambling]], by calling it the archaic "casting lots" | ||
:*nearly all English translations refer to [[wine]] in a favorable way, when it could be translated as grape juice | :*nearly all English translations refer to [[wine]] in a favorable way, when it could be translated as grape juice | ||
| − | |||
*the [[Multiplication of the loaves]] is recounted twice in a dramatic manner | *the [[Multiplication of the loaves]] is recounted twice in a dramatic manner | ||
*reinforcing the likelihood that Salome was the mother of Mark, he explains that Salome's group '''''purchased''''' spices for [[Jesus]] in {{bibleref|Mark|16|1}} | *reinforcing the likelihood that Salome was the mother of Mark, he explains that Salome's group '''''purchased''''' spices for [[Jesus]] in {{bibleref|Mark|16|1}} | ||
Revision as of 06:24, April 24, 2023
Lessons learned from retranslated Gospel of Mark include a realization that like Shakespeare's works, the Gospel of Mark has subtle humor and cleverness greater than its simplicity of wording. Reading the Gospel of Mark straight through, without verse numbers and in modern terminology, is a wonderful experience.
New lessons learned include:
- the withering of the fig tree is recounted in a very clever, dramatic, captivating, and humorous way
- Mark's sharp criticisms as a teenager of the older, adult Apostles are witty
- Mark's multiple references apparently to himself are remarkably subtle, such as Jesus's Apostles finding a boy who had a little food
- the original Gospel of Mark has an intriguing ending where the women told no "man" of what they found at the empty tomb after the Resurrection, as though only Salome told his young son Mark
- English translations fail to be as strong against addiction as the original:
- the Multiplication of the loaves is recounted twice in a dramatic manner
- reinforcing the likelihood that Salome was the mother of Mark, he explains that Salome's group purchased spices for Jesus in Mark 16:1
- Mark artfully explains how faith can cause action at Mark 11:23: "that man's words will become true," providing a glimpse similar to the Ontological argument to prove the existence of God.
See also
References
| |||||