Difference between revisions of "Stem cell decisions"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a start)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Stem cell decisions''' include this growing list:
 
'''Stem cell decisions''' include this growing list:
 +
*United States v. Cal. Stem Cell Treatment Ctr., No. EDCV 18-1005 JGB (KKx), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156714 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022) (ruling against the FDA in its attempt to stop [[stem cell]] treatments at a clinic in [[California]])
 
*Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Comm., 531 U.S. 341, 351 n.5, 121 S. Ct. 1012, 148 L. Ed. 2d 854 (2001) (Congress rejected in its authorization of the FDA "any intent to directly regulate the practice of medicine.")
 
*Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Comm., 531 U.S. 341, 351 n.5, 121 S. Ct. 1012, 148 L. Ed. 2d 854 (2001) (Congress rejected in its authorization of the FDA "any intent to directly regulate the practice of medicine.")
  
−
(add to list)
+
(add to this list)
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
*[[Stem cell statutes]]
 
*[[Stem cell statutes]]
 
[[category:stem cells]]
 
[[category:stem cells]]

Revision as of 04:57, April 26, 2023

Stem cell decisions include this growing list:

  • United States v. Cal. Stem Cell Treatment Ctr., No. EDCV 18-1005 JGB (KKx), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156714 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022) (ruling against the FDA in its attempt to stop stem cell treatments at a clinic in California)
  • Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Comm., 531 U.S. 341, 351 n.5, 121 S. Ct. 1012, 148 L. Ed. 2d 854 (2001) (Congress rejected in its authorization of the FDA "any intent to directly regulate the practice of medicine.")

(add to this list)

See also