Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paxton Impeachment"
(We disclose political motivations here. Abbott's political incentive to try to destroy Paxton can hardly be denied, and hence its restoration to the introductory part of this entry.) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We disclose political motivations here. Abbott's political incentive to try to destroy Paxton can hardly be denied, and hence its restoration to the introductory part of this entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:06, June 23, 2023 (EDT) | We disclose political motivations here. Abbott's political incentive to try to destroy Paxton can hardly be denied, and hence its restoration to the introductory part of this entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:06, June 23, 2023 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's fine. I've left your allegations in the article when you've provided sources and haven't duplicated things. But you claim that this is "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia", yet you write the article as if it were an op-ed with clear bias toward one viewpoint. I don't care if this is your site -- your minions have already suspended me twice on false allegations of "non-communication" and "using a false identity" (the latter was another person in my complex who was trying to join your group; she's moved on elsewhere) -- so if you want to drop me again it really won't matter. I'm facing major surgery in two months and likely won't survive the hospital stay, so once I'm gone you can do whatever you want. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 18:34, July 2, 2023 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:34, July 2, 2023
We disclose political motivations here. Abbott's political incentive to try to destroy Paxton can hardly be denied, and hence its restoration to the introductory part of this entry.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:06, June 23, 2023 (EDT)
That's fine. I've left your allegations in the article when you've provided sources and haven't duplicated things. But you claim that this is "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia", yet you write the article as if it were an op-ed with clear bias toward one viewpoint. I don't care if this is your site -- your minions have already suspended me twice on false allegations of "non-communication" and "using a false identity" (the latter was another person in my complex who was trying to join your group; she's moved on elsewhere) -- so if you want to drop me again it really won't matter. I'm facing major surgery in two months and likely won't survive the hospital stay, so once I'm gone you can do whatever you want. Quidam65 (talk) 18:34, July 2, 2023 (EDT)