Difference between revisions of "Talk:Humanism"
(Confusing humanism) |
(→Confusing humanism: hard arguement to make) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The previous entry on humanism, confused it with many other secular or atheist philosophies. While e.g. socialism and communism are a secular, it doesn't mean that they are secular humanism. Humanism is decidedly pro-democracy and pro-human rights, so the would do badly under communism. [[User:Order]] June 8. | The previous entry on humanism, confused it with many other secular or atheist philosophies. While e.g. socialism and communism are a secular, it doesn't mean that they are secular humanism. Humanism is decidedly pro-democracy and pro-human rights, so the would do badly under communism. [[User:Order]] June 8. | ||
| + | :This may be a hard arguement to make, for example, Erich Fromm's collection of articles entitled ''Socialist Humanism''. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:57, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:57, June 12, 2007
This seems simultaneously excessive and simplistic. Erasmus, for example, was both pious and humanistic. --WOVcenter 22:07, 10 March 2007 (EST)
I'm not entirely sure how to do it, but could this page be renamed "Secular Humanism" and a new article called "Humanism" or "Christian Humanism" be started? There was a movement in the Rennaisance called "Humanism" (that WOVcenter refers to in the prior comment) that wasn't atheistic, and that had major effects on European history.--Epicurius 19:55, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Confusing humanism
The previous entry on humanism, confused it with many other secular or atheist philosophies. While e.g. socialism and communism are a secular, it doesn't mean that they are secular humanism. Humanism is decidedly pro-democracy and pro-human rights, so the would do badly under communism. User:Order June 8.
- This may be a hard arguement to make, for example, Erich Fromm's collection of articles entitled Socialist Humanism. RobS 13:57, 12 June 2007 (EDT)