Difference between revisions of "Talk:Third World"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I may have my history wrong, but I thought the major players of the non-aligned movement were India and Pakistan. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:55, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I may have my history wrong, but I thought the major players of the non-aligned movement were India and Pakistan. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:55, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
  
−
:There were many errors in this article. While most non-aligned countries were third world, not all the third world was non-aligned. [[Vietnam]] was a third world country, for example, as is [[North Korea]]. The term itself was faulty. In fact, when the USSR collapsed, one could say the many Soviet bloc countries were in essence third world.  
+
:There were many errors in this article. While most non-aligned countries were third world, not all of the third world was non-aligned. [[Vietnam]] was a third world country, for example, as is [[North Korea]]. The term itself was faulty. In fact, when the USSR collapsed, one could say the many Soviet bloc countries were in essence third world.  
 
:The Penguin citation, if that is indeed what the original text in Penguin says, should be removed.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 12:37, August 30, 2023 (EDT)
 
:The Penguin citation, if that is indeed what the original text in Penguin says, should be removed.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 12:37, August 30, 2023 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:39, August 30, 2023

This page needs a lot more information. It makes it sound like underdeveloped countries do not exist even though they clearly do. --Atomicwaist 21:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I may have my history wrong, but I thought the major players of the non-aligned movement were India and Pakistan. DanH 14:55, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

There were many errors in this article. While most non-aligned countries were third world, not all of the third world was non-aligned. Vietnam was a third world country, for example, as is North Korea. The term itself was faulty. In fact, when the USSR collapsed, one could say the many Soviet bloc countries were in essence third world.
The Penguin citation, if that is indeed what the original text in Penguin says, should be removed. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 12:37, August 30, 2023 (EDT)