Difference between revisions of "Talk:World Economic Forum"

Revision as of 18:20, September 7, 2023

hi! I'm new here and would love this page to be a great intro to show to clueless friends.

As an overview of WEF, I'm not sure it does the job for people that just think it's a generic think tank of some kind.
Perhaps the biggest section that could use some help is the 'clueless' section.
It isn't clear to me why they should have predicted those things. Their job seems more to create them on an indeterminate timeframe.
Also, the citations are to the events/facts rather than to their cluelessness.
Are there any cites to their cluelessness?
Finally there and a couple of other places, it would be better imho to use non-blaming words. Even though obviously we will show our view of things, we want others to follow along, concluding on their own the blame, right ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:|]] [[User talk:|(talk)]]

Good points. Have at it. Be Bold, as they say. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 14:20, September 7, 2023 (EDT)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * Also, the citations are to the events/facts rather than to their cluelessness.
 * Are there any cites to their cluelessness?
-* Finally there and a couple of other places, it would be better imho to use non-blaming words. Even though obviously we will show our view of things, we want others to follow along, concluding on their own the blame, right ?
+* Finally there and a couple of other places, it would be better imho to use non-blaming words. Even though obviously we will show our view of things, we want others to follow along, concluding on their own the blame, right ? {{unsigned|}}
+:Good points. Have at it. Be Bold, as they say. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:20, September 7, 2023 (EDT)