Difference between revisions of "Talk:Global fascism"
(→I suggest moving this page title to "Global neofascism": new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
On the other hand, "neofascism," more all-encompassing in what it can refer to, is a better term—the global "fascism" in our present day is not the same old strain of Fascism in Mussolini's Italy, but rather a newly developed form that applies its totalitarian tenets and particularly, a "compromise" between capitalism and Communism ("state capitalism," where private property rights are neither universal nor entirely confiscated, but granted on conditional circumstances), to a differently oriented system. | On the other hand, "neofascism," more all-encompassing in what it can refer to, is a better term—the global "fascism" in our present day is not the same old strain of Fascism in Mussolini's Italy, but rather a newly developed form that applies its totalitarian tenets and particularly, a "compromise" between capitalism and Communism ("state capitalism," where private property rights are neither universal nor entirely confiscated, but granted on conditional circumstances), to a differently oriented system. | ||
| − | A nationalist labor union movement clamoring for a syndicate vanguard/federation to seize the means of production would probably be close to old-school Fascist ideology. Modern-day globalism isn't, and can at best be considered "neofascist." —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:24, September 7, 2023 (EDT) | + | A nationalist labor union movement clamoring for a syndicate vanguard/federation to seize the means of production would probably be close to old-school Fascist ideology. Modern-day globalism isn't, and can at best be considered "neofascist." It is also worth noting that the neo-Marxist social agenda of contemporary globalists is contrary to the cultural social rigidity pursued by Italian Fascists (also a feature of Soviet Communism). Modern-day "moral degeneracy" can be traced to the [[New Left]], whose ideologues borrowed from the [[Frankfurt School]] led by [[Antonio Gramsci]], who tried to assassinate Mussolini. With this fact alone, designating a movement grounded in neo-Marxism as "fascist" is silly, seeing that neo-Marxists were antithetical to the social rigidity aspect of old-school Fascism as well as old-school Communism. (Stalin was culturally "national-conservative") —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 16:24, September 7, 2023 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:28, September 7, 2023
I suggest moving this page title to "Global neofascism"
The problem with "fascism" in this context is that it completely ignores the historical definitive characteristics of fascist ideology. Italian Fascism's occult-rooted concept of orthodox nationalism fused into the tenets of Marxist socialism can be summarized as "national syndicalism with a philosophy of actualism." Unless one can provide a proper basis to designate the globalist agenda as "national syndicalist," the straight-up "fascist" label is simply misleading.
On the other hand, "neofascism," more all-encompassing in what it can refer to, is a better term—the global "fascism" in our present day is not the same old strain of Fascism in Mussolini's Italy, but rather a newly developed form that applies its totalitarian tenets and particularly, a "compromise" between capitalism and Communism ("state capitalism," where private property rights are neither universal nor entirely confiscated, but granted on conditional circumstances), to a differently oriented system.
A nationalist labor union movement clamoring for a syndicate vanguard/federation to seize the means of production would probably be close to old-school Fascist ideology. Modern-day globalism isn't, and can at best be considered "neofascist." It is also worth noting that the neo-Marxist social agenda of contemporary globalists is contrary to the cultural social rigidity pursued by Italian Fascists (also a feature of Soviet Communism). Modern-day "moral degeneracy" can be traced to the New Left, whose ideologues borrowed from the Frankfurt School led by Antonio Gramsci, who tried to assassinate Mussolini. With this fact alone, designating a movement grounded in neo-Marxism as "fascist" is silly, seeing that neo-Marxists were antithetical to the social rigidity aspect of old-school Fascism as well as old-school Communism. (Stalin was culturally "national-conservative") —LT Rev. 22:13 Thursday, 16:24, September 7, 2023 (EDT)