Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation

This page is for Conservapedia Sysops to collect documentation, in the form of diffs, of possible misuse or sysop rights. Only Conservapedia Sysops and assistant sysops can originate complaints and post diffs as evidence here. If an editor wishes to include diffs as evidence after a complaint has been registered, please contact the initiating sysop who may be of assistance.

• Conservapedia:Sysop and Admin Abuse/Archive 1
• Conservapedia:Sysop and Admin Abuse/Conservative/Archive 1
• Conservapdia:Sysop complaint documentation/archive3

To document evidence, please post as the following example:

User:XXX

• Incivility. [diff][diff][diff] ad infinitum
• Personal remark. [diff][diff][diff] "
• Edit warring. [diff][diff][diff] "
• Abuse of blocking privileges. [diff][diff][diff]
• Inappropriate deletion. [diff][diff][diff]

DO NOT post monologues or commentary, such as, "User:XXX is a bad guy because...." Other sysops can read the evidence themselves and determine if a complaint is trolling, without merit, or bona fide.

Case #1

User:LT (contribs)

Since signing the Conservapedia:CP Civility Association pledge, User:LT has violated Conservapedia Commandments and Guidelines at least a dozen times in the first 24 hours by posting trolling comments and personal attacks across multiple project and user talk pages.

• Incivility: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]

Ah yes, clearly, hurting the fragile feelings of Communazi bums is such an infraction. Meanwhile, RobaalSmith going around calling everyone who criticizes Putin a "Nazi" is completely fine and not problematic at all, right? Right? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Wednesday, 14:18, November 1, 2023 (EDT)

Also, if 90/10 is such an important rule to enforce, why is PeterKa not blocked? Seems a bit odd to me. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Thursday, 13:27, November 2, 2023 (EDT)