Difference between revisions of "John ending"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(John 21 uses the term "son of John" four times to describe Peter, but that expression does not appear anywhere else in the entire Bible. None of the other Gospels, the New Testament letters, or the rest of the Gospel of JOhn ever refe)
(Peter quesioned Jesus about John?)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
== "son of John"? ==
 
== "son of John"? ==
 
John 21 uses the term "son of John" four times to describe [[Peter]], but that expression does not appear anywhere else in the entire [[Bible]].  None of the other [[Gospel]]s, the [[New Testament]] letters, or the rest of the [[Gospel of JOhn]] ever refers to Peter this way.
 
John 21 uses the term "son of John" four times to describe [[Peter]], but that expression does not appear anywhere else in the entire [[Bible]].  None of the other [[Gospel]]s, the [[New Testament]] letters, or the rest of the [[Gospel of JOhn]] ever refers to Peter this way.
 +
 
== Implausible reference to "153" ==
 
== Implausible reference to "153" ==
 
This ending contains at {{bibleref|John|21|11}} an implausible reference to the large, specific number of 153, which is found nowhere else in the [[Gospel of John]], as instead it refers to approximate round numbers as most authors would.
 
This ending contains at {{bibleref|John|21|11}} an implausible reference to the large, specific number of 153, which is found nowhere else in the [[Gospel of John]], as instead it refers to approximate round numbers as most authors would.
Line 14: Line 15:
 
In addition, there was no reason or time for counting the fish, which were far too many for the group to eat.  [[Jesus]] had called the fishermen-disciples to breakfast, and it is implausible that they would have kept Jesus waiting while needlessly counting a large number of fish in near darkness.
 
In addition, there was no reason or time for counting the fish, which were far too many for the group to eat.  [[Jesus]] had called the fishermen-disciples to breakfast, and it is implausible that they would have kept Jesus waiting while needlessly counting a large number of fish in near darkness.
  
 +
== Peter quesioned Jesus about John? ==
 +
John 21 depicts Peter as complaining to [[Jesus]] about favoritism, after the [[Resurrection]]. This is unlike anything else in the [[New Testament]] and seems more likely to have been written by an admirer of [[John]] than by John himself.  After all that they had been through by this point, such a questioning of [[Jesus]] at this point seems implausible.
 
== Analogy to Mark ending ==
 
== Analogy to Mark ending ==
 
Virtually everyone agrees that the [[Mark ending]] was a later addition, so it is proper to ask if the somewhat rehashed text comprising John chapter 21, after the clear ending above was likewise a later addition to the [[Gospel of John]].
 
Virtually everyone agrees that the [[Mark ending]] was a later addition, so it is proper to ask if the somewhat rehashed text comprising John chapter 21, after the clear ending above was likewise a later addition to the [[Gospel of John]].

Revision as of 08:50, January 14, 2024

The John ending - the true ending of the Gospel of John -- is an issue that is legitimately debated. There are strong reasons to conclude that its authentic ending is at John 20:31-31 as follows:

“ Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name. ”

Unusual use of "I" and "we"

In John chapter 21, which follows the above ending, there is an unusual use of "I" that is never used anywhere else by John. TThe use of "we" in John 21 is also uncharacteristic of John, lacking clarity to it.

Inconsistent term for "children"

John 21:5 quotes Jesus as addressing his own Apostles -- grown men -- as "little children," using a Greek term (παιδίον, Strong's G3813) that is different from the Greek term used appropriately earlier in the same Gospel when Jesus, as the teacher, addressed his Apostles as his students (τεκνίον, Strong's G5040).[1]

"son of John"?

John 21 uses the term "son of John" four times to describe Peter, but that expression does not appear anywhere else in the entire Bible. None of the other Gospels, the New Testament letters, or the rest of the Gospel of JOhn ever refers to Peter this way.

Implausible reference to "153"

This ending contains at John 21:11 an implausible reference to the large, specific number of 153, which is found nowhere else in the Gospel of John, as instead it refers to approximate round numbers as most authors would.

In addition, there was no reason or time for counting the fish, which were far too many for the group to eat. Jesus had called the fishermen-disciples to breakfast, and it is implausible that they would have kept Jesus waiting while needlessly counting a large number of fish in near darkness.

Peter quesioned Jesus about John?

John 21 depicts Peter as complaining to Jesus about favoritism, after the Resurrection. This is unlike anything else in the New Testament and seems more likely to have been written by an admirer of John than by John himself. After all that they had been through by this point, such a questioning of Jesus at this point seems implausible.

Analogy to Mark ending

Virtually everyone agrees that the Mark ending was a later addition, so it is proper to ask if the somewhat rehashed text comprising John chapter 21, after the clear ending above was likewise a later addition to the Gospel of John.

See also

References