Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:  
:::Correction accepted. The Bible makes no claim to be inerrant.  Instead, others make this claim of the Bible.  Similarly, finding an error in the theory of evolution would only disprove the individual proposition -- it would not disprove evolutionary theory in it's entirety. [[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]]
 
:::Correction accepted. The Bible makes no claim to be inerrant.  Instead, others make this claim of the Bible.  Similarly, finding an error in the theory of evolution would only disprove the individual proposition -- it would not disprove evolutionary theory in it's entirety. [[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]]
 
::The Theory of Evolution is still falsifiable.  Tens of thousands of papers and supporting theories would need to be refuted before one could claim the larger evolutionary theory has been refuted.[[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]]
 
::The Theory of Evolution is still falsifiable.  Tens of thousands of papers and supporting theories would need to be refuted before one could claim the larger evolutionary theory has been refuted.[[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]]
 +
:::Okay, that's your position, but clearly it's not something that even all evolutionists agree on.  And I did notice the error in claiming that the Bible claims to be inerrant, but whilst the Bible doesn't directly explicitly claim that, I believe that is a reasonable deduction from what it does claim, and furthermore it wasn't the key point that PerpetualAngst was making, so I decided to ignore that point (which is not to suggest that there was anything wrong with Ungtss responding to it).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:30, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu