Difference between revisions of "Quote mining"
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
An example of a mined quotation (bold), from the full quote (in italics) which shows the author's intended impression: | An example of a mined quotation (bold), from the full quote (in italics) which shows the author's intended impression: | ||
| − | <blockquote>“'''The seemingly sudden appearance of skeletonized life has been one of the most perplexing puzzles of the fossil record. How is it that animals as complex as trilobites and brachiopods could spring forth so suddenly, completely formed, without a trace of their ancestors in the underlying strata? If ever there was evidence suggesting Divine Creation, surely the Precambrian and Cambrian transition, known from numerous localities across the face of the earth, is it.''' ''Until almost 1950 the absence of metazoan fossils older than Cambrian age continued to puzzle evolutionists and earth historians alike. Other than the remains of single-celled creatures and the matlike stromatolites, it did indeed look as if larger creatures had arisen with a swiftness that made a mockery of Darwin’s theory of evolution. This notion was finally put to rest, however, by the discovery of the Ediacarian and Vendian fossil faunas of the latest Precambrian age.'' ”<ref>http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2004/06/dembskis_five_q.html</ref> -- [[Peter Ward]], from ''[[On Methuselah’s Trail: Living Fossils and the Great Extinctions]]'', 1992.</blockquote> | + | <blockquote>“'''The seemingly sudden appearance of skeletonized life has been one of the most perplexing puzzles of the fossil record. How is it that animals as complex as trilobites and brachiopods could spring forth so suddenly, completely formed, without a trace of their ancestors in the underlying strata? If ever there was evidence suggesting Divine Creation, surely the Precambrian and Cambrian transition, known from numerous localities across the face of the earth, is it.''' ''Until almost 1950 the absence of metazoan fossils older than Cambrian age continued to puzzle evolutionists and earth historians alike. Other than the remains of single-celled creatures and the matlike stromatolites, it did indeed look as if larger creatures had arisen with a swiftness that made a mockery of Darwin’s theory of evolution. This notion was finally put to rest, however, by the discovery of the Ediacarian and Vendian fossil faunas of the latest Precambrian age.'' ”<ref name="pandathumb">http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2004/06/dembskis_five_q.html</ref> -- [[Peter Ward]], from ''[[On Methuselah’s Trail: Living Fossils and the Great Extinctions]]'', 1992.</blockquote> |
| − | This quote was used in a post by [[Intelligent design]] proponent [[William Dembski]].<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20040622075401/http://www.family.org/cforum/citizenmag/webonly/a0031659.cfm</ref> Critics later picked up on it and accused Dembski of using underhanded quote mining. <ref | + | This quote was used in a post by [[Intelligent design]] proponent [[William Dembski]].<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20040622075401/http://www.family.org/cforum/citizenmag/webonly/a0031659.cfm</ref> Critics later picked up on it and accused Dembski of using underhanded quote mining. <ref name="pandathumb"/> Dembski, however, responded that the quote as legitimate, that he proved the source and the context was clear. <ref name="dembski">http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/quoting-misquoting-quote-mining/</ref> Dembski said the real problem was that supporters of Evolution would never admit to questioning the theory: |
<blockquote>Word of advice: if you are an evolutionist and don’t want to be quoted by evolution critics for being critical of evolution, resist the urge — don’t criticize it. If tempted, even if the reality of evolution’s gaping holes is staring you in the face, close your eyes and repeat the phrase “overwhelming evidence” or “nothing in biology makes sense apart from evolution.”<ref name="dembski"/></blockquote> | <blockquote>Word of advice: if you are an evolutionist and don’t want to be quoted by evolution critics for being critical of evolution, resist the urge — don’t criticize it. If tempted, even if the reality of evolution’s gaping holes is staring you in the face, close your eyes and repeat the phrase “overwhelming evidence” or “nothing in biology makes sense apart from evolution.”<ref name="dembski"/></blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 17:11, March 8, 2007
Quote mining is debate tactic that is often accused of being intellectually dishonest. Quote mining occurs when a quotation is either taken out of context or abridged in such a way as to give an impression the 'miner' desires, but which is not that of the original person quoted. [1]
An example of a mined quotation (bold), from the full quote (in italics) which shows the author's intended impression:
“The seemingly sudden appearance of skeletonized life has been one of the most perplexing puzzles of the fossil record. How is it that animals as complex as trilobites and brachiopods could spring forth so suddenly, completely formed, without a trace of their ancestors in the underlying strata? If ever there was evidence suggesting Divine Creation, surely the Precambrian and Cambrian transition, known from numerous localities across the face of the earth, is it. Until almost 1950 the absence of metazoan fossils older than Cambrian age continued to puzzle evolutionists and earth historians alike. Other than the remains of single-celled creatures and the matlike stromatolites, it did indeed look as if larger creatures had arisen with a swiftness that made a mockery of Darwin’s theory of evolution. This notion was finally put to rest, however, by the discovery of the Ediacarian and Vendian fossil faunas of the latest Precambrian age. ”[2] -- Peter Ward, from On Methuselah’s Trail: Living Fossils and the Great Extinctions, 1992.
This quote was used in a post by Intelligent design proponent William Dembski.[3] Critics later picked up on it and accused Dembski of using underhanded quote mining. [2] Dembski, however, responded that the quote as legitimate, that he proved the source and the context was clear. [4] Dembski said the real problem was that supporters of Evolution would never admit to questioning the theory:
Word of advice: if you are an evolutionist and don’t want to be quoted by evolution critics for being critical of evolution, resist the urge — don’t criticize it. If tempted, even if the reality of evolution’s gaping holes is staring you in the face, close your eyes and repeat the phrase “overwhelming evidence” or “nothing in biology makes sense apart from evolution.”[4]
References
- ↑ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/project.html
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2004/06/dembskis_five_q.html
- ↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20040622075401/http://www.family.org/cforum/citizenmag/webonly/a0031659.cfm
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/quoting-misquoting-quote-mining/
External Links
- Scientists Speak About Evolution
- Selected Creation/Evolution Quotes
- Creation Quotes list from Answers in Genesis
- The Quote Mine Project - hosted by the talk.origins archive