Difference between revisions of "Talk:Debate:Was Christ a fundamentalist?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I guess this depends on what the "fundus" (= bottom) is for the fundamentalist. Is the bottom the spoken words or the written words? Because I doubt Jesus had access to the Old Testament, did he? But if by "fundus" you mean the spoken words, then the answer would be at least, "Maybe." --[[User:Pepsi-Cola|Pepsi-Cola]] 20:29, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
 
I guess this depends on what the "fundus" (= bottom) is for the fundamentalist. Is the bottom the spoken words or the written words? Because I doubt Jesus had access to the Old Testament, did he? But if by "fundus" you mean the spoken words, then the answer would be at least, "Maybe." --[[User:Pepsi-Cola|Pepsi-Cola]] 20:29, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Why wouldn't He have had access to the Torah and the Tanakh?? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 20:36, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Why wouldn't He have had access to the Torah and the Tanakh?? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 20:36, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Well, if that's the case, then I guess he was a fundamentalist. --[[User:Pepsi-Cola|Pepsi-Cola]] 20:40, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 00:40, June 27, 2007

I guess this depends on what the "fundus" (= bottom) is for the fundamentalist. Is the bottom the spoken words or the written words? Because I doubt Jesus had access to the Old Testament, did he? But if by "fundus" you mean the spoken words, then the answer would be at least, "Maybe." --Pepsi-Cola 20:29, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

Why wouldn't He have had access to the Torah and the Tanakh?? File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 20:36, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
Well, if that's the case, then I guess he was a fundamentalist. --Pepsi-Cola 20:40, 26 June 2007 (EDT)