Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/technology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Artificial intelligence == | == Artificial intelligence == | ||
| + | *[https://www.ccn.com/education/deepseek-vs-chatgpt-key-differences-explained/ What Is Deepseek and How Is It Different From ChatGPT?] | ||
*[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqx9zn27700o DeepSeek vs ChatGPT - how do they compare?] | *[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqx9zn27700o DeepSeek vs ChatGPT - how do they compare?] | ||
*[https://mashable.com/article/deepseek-ai-vs-openai-chatgpt Here's what DeepSeek AI does better than OpenAI's ChatGPT], Mashable | *[https://mashable.com/article/deepseek-ai-vs-openai-chatgpt Here's what DeepSeek AI does better than OpenAI's ChatGPT], Mashable | ||
Revision as of 03:23, January 29, 2025
YouTube
Innovation
Innovation articles:
Artificial intelligence
- What Is Deepseek and How Is It Different From ChatGPT?
- DeepSeek vs ChatGPT - how do they compare?
- Here's what DeepSeek AI does better than OpenAI's ChatGPT, Mashable
Changing face of workplace
Droids:
Robotics:
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part I
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part II
- Humans Need Not Apply
- Rising Robots: Is it Obvious Robots Cost Human Jobs? Looking for Someone to Blame
Robots and economic process of creative destruction:
Robots and repetitive jobs:
Problems with modern scientific community
- Modern science is non-science
- Quackery Crisis! Less than 1 percent of Scientific Journals Utilize Scientific Method
Scientific community and science publications
Social science literature has major problems
Environmental science
Military technology
SR-71 Blackbird:
- SR-71 Blackbird was so fast it outran every missile, Mig fighter jet encountered over enemy territory
- Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Fastest Jet in the World
Apache helicopters and helicopter gunships:
Creation vs. evolution
"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[1]