Difference between revisions of "Abductive reasoning"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Philosophy of Science]] | [[Category:Philosophy of Science]] | ||
Revision as of 00:09, August 8, 2025
Abductive reasoning or abduction infers unseen facts, events, or causes in the past from clues or facts in the present. It is a type of reasoning used by historical scientists when they reason from clues back to causes.[1] The American philosopher and logician Charles Sanders Peirce was the first to describe it. As he noted, the problem with abductive reasoning is that there is often more than one cause that can explain the same effect. He suggested that a particular abductive hypothesis can be firmly established if it can be shown that it represents the best or only explanation of the "manifest effects" in question.[2]
External links
- Deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning, Butte College
References
- ↑ Meyer (2008). Of Clues and Causes, 36–76.
- ↑ Meyer, Stephen C. (2008). Signature in the Cell. New York: HarperOne, 153–156. ISBN 978-0-06-147279-2.