Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Team contest"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Excellent suggestion. Contributions to the front page are always very helpful. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 09:57, 2 July 2007 (EDT) | :Excellent suggestion. Contributions to the front page are always very helpful. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 09:57, 2 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | At a quick glance, it seems like giving points for blocking is going to put teams with members that don't have blocking rights at a disadvantage. Plus, you also have a bit of dumb luck there too, depending on the quantity of vandals online when a particular sysop is online. Also consider, you are saying 5 blocks = 1 Quality New Article in point value. The time taken to write a quality article is much greater than the time it takes to block 5 people. Just my two cents. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 10:07, 2 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:07, July 2, 2007
Scoring System
I suggest including edits to Template:Newsline, Template:AboutC, and Template:Tfa, since they help this site as well. Crocoite 09:55, 2 July 2007 (EDT)
- Excellent suggestion. Contributions to the front page are always very helpful. ~ SharonTalk 09:57, 2 July 2007 (EDT)
At a quick glance, it seems like giving points for blocking is going to put teams with members that don't have blocking rights at a disadvantage. Plus, you also have a bit of dumb luck there too, depending on the quantity of vandals online when a particular sysop is online. Also consider, you are saying 5 blocks = 1 Quality New Article in point value. The time taken to write a quality article is much greater than the time it takes to block 5 people. Just my two cents. --Colest 10:07, 2 July 2007 (EDT)