Difference between revisions of "Open letter to Andy Schlafly"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
These attacks in most all instances are cut and paste [[spam]] postings to dozens of [[Conservapedia]] pages, making it nearly impossible to respond to or revert everywhere. These targeted attacks continue despite [[Conservapedia]]'s written prohibitions against such attacks, and your private appeals to stop. They now have escalated with calls for [[violence]] against other editors. | These attacks in most all instances are cut and paste [[spam]] postings to dozens of [[Conservapedia]] pages, making it nearly impossible to respond to or revert everywhere. These targeted attacks continue despite [[Conservapedia]]'s written prohibitions against such attacks, and your private appeals to stop. They now have escalated with calls for [[violence]] against other editors. | ||
| − | This conduct should not be tolerated on any website - targeted personal attacks and calls for [[violence]] against other users. [[Conservapedia]] needs meaningful reform, with | + | This conduct should not be tolerated on any website - targeted personal attacks and calls for [[violence]] against other users. His latest effort is tailoring [[AI]] queries to target editors for personal attacks. [[Conservapedia]] needs meaningful reform, with more effective moderation and enforcement provisions, not just quiet appeals for civility. |
These reforms should address: | These reforms should address: | ||
Revision as of 17:51, September 14, 2025
Dear Andy,
For several years now I have been the target of spurious attacks by a Senior Administrator in Mainspace articles, Page titles, Essays, discussion pages, user talk pages, edit summaries, and the Sysop email list.
These attacks in most all instances are cut and paste spam postings to dozens of Conservapedia pages, making it nearly impossible to respond to or revert everywhere. These targeted attacks continue despite Conservapedia's written prohibitions against such attacks, and your private appeals to stop. They now have escalated with calls for violence against other editors.
This conduct should not be tolerated on any website - targeted personal attacks and calls for violence against other users. His latest effort is tailoring AI queries to target editors for personal attacks. Conservapedia needs meaningful reform, with more effective moderation and enforcement provisions, not just quiet appeals for civility.
These reforms should address:
I have some ideas how these problem areas can be addressed and invite other editors as well to provide input.
Senior Administrator