There is a [[Talmud]]ic concept</b> (B.B. 16b)<b>, based on</b> [[Job]] 34:35,<b> that a person may not held responsible for his mistaken speech because he spoke "while he was suffering". (Empathy). That might be when was in immense mourning etc. Though, even when exploding, it can reveal dark demons - which is another concept [Eruvin 65], that a person is exposed in 3 formats, one is when at one's rage. But not when composed, in a calculated written letter </b>(with that stench blaming) <b>VS In the spur of the monent. It shows malice. | There is a [[Talmud]]ic concept</b> (B.B. 16b)<b>, based on</b> [[Job]] 34:35,<b> that a person may not held responsible for his mistaken speech because he spoke "while he was suffering". (Empathy). That might be when was in immense mourning etc. Though, even when exploding, it can reveal dark demons - which is another concept [Eruvin 65], that a person is exposed in 3 formats, one is when at one's rage. But not when composed, in a calculated written letter </b>(with that stench blaming) <b>VS In the spur of the monent. It shows malice. |