Changes

22,133 bytes added , July 15

→‎Terrorist attack on Nordstream pipeline

Line 1: Line 1:

[[File:Jake 'al Qaeda is on our side' Sullivan.PNG|right|350px|thumb|Jake Sullivan.]]

−

'''Jacob Jeremiah “ Jake “ Sullivan''' (b. 1976) as of 2021 ~~was~~ the [[National Security Adviser]] for the [[Biden junta]]. ~~Sullivan is a [[psychotic]] [[nuclear war]]monger,~~<ref>American expert at Moscow State University, Dr. Rafael Ordukhanyan says of Sullivan: "He has a reputation for being a relatively sane politician, even though I don't think he is." [https://tehnowar.ru/394481-Amerikanist-Orduhanyan-«dialog»-Sallivana-s-Rossiey-privel-k-vaghnomu-vyvodu-ob-Ukraine.html Americanist Ordukhanyan: Sullivan's "dialogue" with Russia led to an important conclusion about Ukraine], November 7, 2022.</ref> [[al Qaeda]] collaborator,<ref>[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/04/20/al_qaeda_is_on_our_side_how_obamabiden_officials_helped_create_a_safe_haven_for_terrorists_in_syria_827477.html 'Al Qaeda Is on Our Side': How Obama/Biden Team Empowered Terrorist Networks in Syria], By Aaron Maté, RealClearInvestigations, April 20, 2022.</ref> and [[Nazi]] ~~sympathizer.~~<ref>[https://mronline.org/2022/03/10/ukraine-and-the-new-al-qaeda/ Ukraine and the new Al Qaeda], By Whitney Webb (Posted Mar 10, 2022). mronline.org. Originally published: The Last American Vagabond on March 2, 2022</ref> Sullivan ~~was~~ the chief line of contact between the Biden regime and the [[Kremlin]] during the [[NATO war in Ukraine]].

+

'''Jacob Jeremiah "Jake the Snake" Sullivan''' (b. 1976) as of 2021 is the [[psychotic]] [[nuclear war]]mongering [[National Security Adviser]] for the [[Biden junta]].<ref>American expert at Moscow State University, Dr. Rafael Ordukhanyan says of Sullivan: "He has a reputation for being a relatively sane politician, even though I don't think he is." [https://tehnowar.ru/394481-Amerikanist-Orduhanyan-«dialog»-Sallivana-s-Rossiey-privel-k-vaghnomu-vyvodu-ob-Ukraine.html Americanist Ordukhanyan: Sullivan's "dialogue" with Russia led to an important conclusion about Ukraine], November 7, 2022.</ref> Sullivan, an [[al Qaeda]] collaborator<ref>[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/04/20/al_qaeda_is_on_our_side_how_obamabiden_officials_helped_create_a_safe_haven_for_terrorists_in_syria_827477.html 'Al Qaeda Is on Our Side': How Obama/Biden Team Empowered Terrorist Networks in Syria], By Aaron Maté, RealClearInvestigations, April 20, 2022.</ref> and [[Nazi sympathizer]],<ref>[https://mronline.org/2022/03/10/ukraine-and-the-new-al-qaeda/ Ukraine and the new Al Qaeda], By [[Whitney Webb]] (Posted Mar 10, 2022). mronline.org. Originally published: The Last American Vagabond on March 2, 2022</ref> masterminded the Act of War committed against the [[German]] people and [[Russian Federation]] with the environmental terrorist attack on civilian infrastructure and the [[Nordstream pipeline]].<ref>[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/02/08/details-surface-of-biden-administration-deliberately-destroying-nord-stream-pipeline-then-lying-about-it-repeatedly/ Details Surface of Biden Administration Deliberately Destroying Nord Stream Pipeline, Then Lying About It Repeatedly], February 8, 2023. ''Conservativetreehouse.</ref> [[Nordstream pipeline]], a civilian infrastructure project. Sullivan is the chief line of contact between the Biden regime and the [[Kremlin]] during the [[NATO war in Ukraine]].

In an interview with [[NPR]] billed as "Why Biden's National Security Adviser Plans To Focus On The U.S. Middle Class" Sullivan said, “We’ve reached a point where [[foreign policy]] is domestic policy, and domestic policy is foreign policy.”<ref>[https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/30/951280373/why-bidens-national-security-adviser-plans-to-focus-on-the-u-s-middle-class Why Biden's National Security Adviser Plans To Focus On The U.S. Middle Class], December 30, 2020, Heard on Morning Edition. Scott Detrow.</ref> Sullivan made no effort to explain how abandoning American citizens to [[Taliban]] terrorists in [[Afghanistan]] or U.S. support for [[Ukrainian Nazis]] benefits the [[middle class]].

Line 8: Line 8:

Sullivan is married to Maggie Goodlander, counsel to [[corrupt]] [[Biden DOJ]] head [[Merrick Garland]].<ref>https://law.unh.edu/blog/2020/10/conversation-judge-merrick-b-garland</ref> Sullivan never had a real job anywhere outside of academia or the [[Obama administration]]. Sullivan has no firsthand knowledge or experience and learned to [[hate]] Russia in school.

−

==~~NATO war~~ in Ukraine==

+

==Support for Nazis in Ukraine==

[[File:Azov victim 1.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Murdered woman by [[Biden]]-backed [[neo-Nazi]]s with a [[swastika]] painted on her chest in her own blood found in the basement of Mariupol School #25, which the [[Azov Battalion]] used as a headquarters.<ref>https://videopress.com/embed/pZ2UoEfN?cover=1&preloadContent=metadata&useAverageColor=1&hd=1Video:</ref><ref>https://youtu.be/j0GDBUpmj3I</ref><ref>https://youtu.be/6LQSYmda0Sc</ref>]]

+

National Security advisor Jake Sullivan initially ruled out [[ATACMS]] "to ensure that we don't get into a situation in which we are approaching the Third World War".

+

===Terrorist attack on Nordstream pipeline===

+

Biden and his foreign policy team—National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State [[Tony Blinken]], and [[Victoria Nuland]], the Undersecretary of State for Policy—had been vocal and consistent in their hostility to the two pipelines, which ran side by side for 750 miles under the [[Baltic Sea]] from two different ports in northeastern Russia near the [[Estonia]]n border, passing close to the [[Danish]] island of Bornholm before ending in northern [[Germany]].

+

The direct route, which bypassed any need to transit [[Ukraine]], had been a boon for the German [[economy]], which enjoyed an abundance of cheap Russian [[natural gas]]—enough to run its factories and heat its homes while enabling German distributors to sell excess gas, at a [[profit]], throughout [[Western Europe]]. Action that could be traced to the Biden regime would violate US promises to minimize direct conflict with Russia. Secrecy was essential.

+

<!--From its earliest days, [[Nord Stream 1]] was seen by [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] and its [[anti-Russian]] [[NATO]] partners as a threat to [[Western alliance|western dominance]]. The holding company behind it, Nord Stream AG, was incorporated in Switzerland in 2005 in partnership with [[Gazprom]], a publicly traded Russian company producing enormous profits for shareholders which is dominated by oligarchs known to be in the thrall of Putin. Gazprom controlled 51 percent of the company, with four European energy firms—one in France, one in the Netherlands and two in Germany—sharing the remaining 49 percent of stock, and having the right to control downstream sales of the inexpensive natural gas to local distributors in Germany and Western Europe. Gazprom’s profits were shared with the Russian government, and state gas and oil revenues were estimated in some years to amount to as much as 45 percent of Russia’s annual budget.

+

America’s political fears were real: Putin would now have an additional and much-needed major source of income, and Germany and the rest of Western Europe would become addicted to low-cost natural gas supplied by Russia—while diminishing European reliance on America. In fact, that’s exactly what happened.-->Many Germans saw Nord Stream 1 as part of the deliverance of former Chancellor [[Willy Brandt]]’s famed ''[[Ostpolitik]]'', which would enable postwar Germany to rehabilitate itself and other European nations destroyed in [[World War II]] by, among other initiatives, utilizing cheap Russian gas to fuel a prosperous Western European market and trading economy.

+

<!--Nord Stream 1 was dangerous enough, in the view of NATO and Washington, but Nord Stream 2, whose construction was completed in September of 2021, would, if approved by German regulators, double the amount of cheap gas that would be available to Germany and Western Europe. The second pipeline also would provide enough gas for more than 50 percent of Germany’s annual consumption. Tensions were constantly escalating between Russia and NATO, backed by the aggressive foreign policy of the Biden Administration.

+

Opposition to Nord Stream 2 flared on the eve of the Biden inauguration in January 2021, when Senate Republicans, led by Ted Cruz of Texas, repeatedly raised the political threat of cheap Russian natural gas during the confirmation hearing of Blinken as Secretary of State. By then a unified Senate had successfully passed a law that, as Cruz told Blinken, “halted [the pipeline] in its tracks.” There would be enormous political and economic pressure from the German government, then headed by [[Angela Merkel]], to get the second pipeline online.

+

Would Biden stand up to the Germans? Blinken said yes, but added that he had not discussed the specifics of the incoming President’s views. “I know his strong conviction that this is a bad idea, the Nord Stream 2,” he said. “I know that he would have us use every persuasive tool that we have to convince our friends and partners, including Germany, not to move forward with it.”

+

A few months later, as the construction of the second pipeline neared completion, Biden blinked. That May, in a stunning turnaround, the administration waived sanctions against Nord Stream AG, with a State Department official conceding that trying to stop the pipeline through sanctions and diplomacy had “always been a long shot.” Behind the scenes, administration officials reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, by then facing a threat of Russian invasion, not to criticize the move.

+

There were immediate consequences. Senate Republicans, led by Cruz, announced an immediate blockade of all of Biden’s foreign policy nominees and delayed passage of the annual defense bill for months, deep into the fall. Politico later depicted Biden’s turnabout on the second Russian pipeline as “the one decision, arguably more than the chaotic military withdrawal from Afghanistan, that has imperiled Biden’s agenda.”

+

The administration was floundering, despite getting a reprieve on the crisis in mid-November, when Germany’s energy regulators suspended approval of the second Nord Stream pipeline. Natural gas prices surged 8% within days, amid growing fears in Germany and Europe that the pipeline suspension and the growing possibility of a war between Russia and Ukraine would lead to a very much unwanted cold winter. It was not clear to Washington just where Olaf Scholz, Germany’s newly appointed chancellor, stood. Months earlier, after the fall of Afghanistan, Scholtz had publicly endorsed French President Emmanuel Macron’s call for a more autonomous European foreign policy in a speech in Prague—clearly suggesting less reliance on Washington and its mercurial actions.

+

Throughout all of this, Russian troops had been steadily and ominously building up on the borders of Ukraine, and by the end of December more than 100,000 soldiers were in position to strike from Belarus and Crimea. Alarm was growing in Washington, including an assessment from Blinken that those troop numbers could be “doubled in short order.”

+

The administration’s attention once again was focused on Nord Stream. As long as Europe remained dependent on the pipelines for cheap natural gas, Washington was afraid that countries like Germany would be reluctant to supply Ukraine with the money and weapons it needed to defeat Russia.

+

It was at this unsettled moment that-->Biden authorized Jake Sullivan to bring together an interagency group to come up with a plan.

+

In December of 2021, two months before the first Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine, Jake Sullivan convened a meeting of a newly formed task force—men and women from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the CIA, and the State and Treasury Departments—and asked for recommendations about how to respond to Putin’s impending invasion.

+

It would be the first of a series of top-secret meetings, in a secure room on a top floor of the Old Executive Office Building, adjacent to the [[White House]], that was also the home of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB). There was the usual back and forth chatter that eventually led to a crucial preliminary question: Would the recommendation forwarded by the group to Biden be reversible—such as another layer of sanctions and [[currency]] restrictions—or irreversible—that is, kinetic actions, which could not be undone?

+

What became clear to participants is that Sullivan intended for the group to come up with a plan for the destruction of the two [[Nord Stream]] pipelines—and that he was delivering on the desires of Biden.

+

Over the next several meetings, the participants debated options for an attack. The [[U.S. Navy|Navy]] proposed using a newly commissioned [[submarine]] to assault the pipeline directly. The [[Air Force]] discussed dropping bombs with delayed fuses that could be set off remotely. The [[CIA]] argued that whatever was done, it would have to be covert. Everyone involved understood the stakes. “This is not kiddie stuff,” according to a source directly familiar with the matter said. If the attack were traceable to the United States, “It’s an act of war.”

+

<!--At the time, the CIA was directed by [[William Burns]], a mild-mannered former ambassador to Russia who had served as deputy secretary of state in the [[Obama Administration]]. Burns quickly authorized an Agency working group whose ad hoc members included—by chance—someone who was familiar with the capabilities of the Navy’s deep-sea divers in Panama City. Over the next few weeks, members of the CIA’s working group began to craft a plan for a covert operation that would use deep-sea divers to trigger an explosion along the pipeline.

+

Something like this had been done before. In 1971, the American intelligence community learned from still undisclosed sources that two important units of the Russian Navy were communicating via an undersea cable buried in the Sea of Okhotsk, on Russia’s Far East Coast. The cable linked a regional Navy command to the mainland headquarters at [[Vladivostok]].

+

A hand-picked team of Central Intelligence Agency and [[National Security Agency]] operatives was assembled somewhere in the Washington area, under deep cover, and worked out a plan, using Navy divers, modified submarines and a deep-submarine rescue vehicle, that succeeded, after much trial and error, in locating the Russian cable. The divers planted a sophisticated listening device on the cable that successfully intercepted the Russian traffic and recorded it on a taping system.

+

The NSA learned that senior Russian navy officers, convinced of the security of their communication link, chatted away with their peers without encryption. The recording device and its tape had to be replaced monthly and the project rolled on merrily for a decade until it was compromised by a forty-four-year-old civilian NSA technician named Ronald Pelton who was fluent in Russian. Pelton was betrayed by a Russian defector in 1985 and sentenced to prison. He was paid just $5,000 by the Russians for his revelations about the operation, along with $35,000 for other Russian operational data he provided that was never made public.

+

That underwater success, codenamed Ivy Bells, was innovative and risky, and produced invaluable intelligence about the Russian Navy’s intentions and planning.

+

Still, the interagency group was initially skeptical of the CIA’s enthusiasm for a covert deep-sea attack. There were too many unanswered questions. The waters of the Baltic Sea were heavily patrolled by the Russian navy, and there were no oil rigs that could be used as cover for a diving operation. Would the divers have to go to Estonia, right across the border from Russia’s natural gas loading docks, to train for the mission? “It would be a goat fuck,” the Agency was told.-->

+

Throughout “all of this scheming,” the source said, “some working guys in the CIA and the [[State Department]] were saying, ‘Don’t do this. It’s stupid and will be a political nightmare if it comes out.’”

+

Nevertheless, in early 2022, the CIA working group reported back to Sullivan’s interagency group: “We have a way to blow up the pipelines.”

+

What came next was stunning. On February 7, 2022 less than three weeks before the seemingly inevitable [[Special military operation|Russian invasion of Ukraine]], Biden met in his White House office with German Chancellor [[Olaf Scholz]], who, after some wobbling, was now firmly on the American team. At the press briefing that followed, Biden defiantly said, “If Russia invades . . . there will be no longer a [[Nord Stream 2]]. We will bring an end to it.”

+

Twenty days earlier, Undersecretary Nuland had delivered essentially the same message at a State Department briefing, with little press coverage. “I want to be very clear to you today,” she said in response to a question. “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”

+

Several of those involved in planning the pipeline mission were dismayed by what they viewed as indirect references to the attack.

+

“It was like putting an [[atomic bomb]] on the ground in [[Tokyo]] and telling the [[Japan]]ese that we are going to detonate it. The plan was for the options to be executed post invasion and not advertised publicly. Biden simply didn’t get it or ignored it.”

+

Biden’s and Nuland’s indiscretion, if that is what it was, might have frustrated some of the planners. But it also created an opportunity. According to the source, some of the senior officials of the CIA determined that blowing up the pipeline “no longer could be considered a covert option because the President just announced that we knew how to do it.”

+

The plan to blow up Nord Stream 1 and 2 was suddenly downgraded from a covert operation requiring that Congress be informed to one that was deemed as a highly classified intelligence operation with U.S. military support. Under the law, the source explained, “There was no longer a legal requirement to report the operation to Congress. All they had to do now is just do it—but it still had to be secret. The Russians have superlative [[surveillance]] of the Baltic Sea.”

+

The Agency working group members had no direct contact with the White House, and were eager to find out if Biden meant what he’d said—that is, if the mission was now a go. The source recalled, “[[Bill Burns]] comes back and says, ‘Do it.’”

+

[[Norway]] was the perfect place to base the mission.

+

<!--In the past few years of East-West crisis, the U.S. military has vastly expanded its presence inside Norway, whose western border runs 1,400 miles along the north [[Atlantic Ocean]] and merges above the [[Arctic Circle]] with Russia. The [[Pentagon]] has created high paying jobs and contracts, amid some local controversy, by investing hundreds of millions of dollars to upgrade and expand American Navy and Air Force facilities in Norway. The new works included, most importantly, an advanced synthetic aperture radar far up north that was capable of penetrating deep into Russia and came online just as the American intelligence community lost access to a series of long-range listening sites inside China.

+

A newly refurbished American submarine base, which had been under construction for years, had become operational and more American submarines were now able to work closely with their Norwegian colleagues to monitor and spy on a major Russian nuclear redoubt 250 miles to the east, on the Kola Peninsula. America also has vastly expanded a Norwegian air base in the north and delivered to the Norwegian air force a fleet of Boeing-built P8 Poseidon patrol planes to bolster its long-range spying on all things Russia.

+

In return, the Norwegian government angered liberals and some moderates in its parliament last November by passing the Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement (SDCA). Under the new deal, the U.S. legal system would have jurisdiction in certain “agreed areas” in the North over American soldiers accused of crimes off base, as well as over those Norwegian citizens accused or suspected of interfering with the work at the base.-->

+

Norway was one of the original signatories of the NATO Treaty in 1949, in the early days of the [[Cold War]]. Today, the supreme commander of NATO is [[Jens Stoltenberg]], a committed anti-communist, who served as Norway’s [[prime minister]] for eight years before moving to his high NATO post, with American backing, in 2014. He was a hardliner on all things Putin and Russia who had cooperated with the American intelligence community since the [[Vietnam War]]. He has been trusted completely since. “He is the glove that fits the American hand,” the source said.

+

Back in Washington, planners knew they had to go to Norway. “They hated the Russians, and the Norwegian navy was full of superb sailors and divers who had generations of experience in highly profitable deep-sea oil and gas exploration,” the source said. They also could be trusted to keep the mission secret. (The Norwegians may have had other interests as well. The destruction of Nord Stream—if the Americans could pull it off—would allow Norway to sell vastly more of its own natural gas to Europe.)

+

On September 26, 2022, a NATO [[P8 Poseidon]] surveillance plane made a seemingly routine flight and dropped a sonar buoy. The signal spread underwater, initially to Nord Stream 2 and then on to Nord Stream 1. A few hours later, the high-powered C4 explosives were triggered and three of the four pipelines were put out of commission. Within a few minutes, pools of methane gas that remained in the shuttered pipelines could be seen spreading on the water’s surface and the world learned that something irreversible had taken place.

+

Asked at a press conference days later about the consequences of the worsening energy crisis in Western Europe, Blinken described the moment as a potentially good one:

+

“It’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove the dependence on Russian energy and thus to take away from Vladimir Putin the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing his imperial designs. That’s very significant and that offers tremendous strategic opportunity for the years to come, but meanwhile we’re determined to do everything we possibly can to make sure the consequences of all of this are not borne by citizens in our countries or, for that matter, around the world.”

+

Victoria Nuland expressed satisfaction at the demise of the newest of the pipelines. Testifying at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in late January she told Senator Ted Cruz, “Like you, I am, and I think the Administration is, very gratified to know that Nord Stream 2 is now, as you like to say, a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea.”

+

The source had a much more streetwise view of Biden’s decision to sabotage more than 1500 miles of Gazprom pipeline as winter approached. “Well,” he said, speaking of Biden, “I gotta admit the guy has a pair of balls. He said he was going to do it, and he did.”

+

Asked why he thought the Russians failed to respond, he said cynically, “Maybe they want the capability to do the same things the U.S. did.

+

“It was a beautiful cover story,” he went on. “Behind it was a covert operation that placed experts in the field and equipment that operated on a covert signal.

+

“The only flaw was the decision to do it.”

+

===Jeddah 'peace' summit===

+

[[File:Sullivan and Blinken.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Biden regime war criminals Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken]]

+

Investigative reporter [[Seymour Hersh]] reported in the summer of 2023 that Biden junta national security advisor [[Jake "the Snake" Sullivan]] took an American delegation to the 'second international peace summit' in August at [[Jeddah]] in [[Saudi Arabia]]. The summit was led by Crown Prince [[Mohammed bin Salman]] (MBS) who four years earlier was accused of ordering the assassination and dismemberment of journalist Jamal Khashoggi for the ''Washington Post'' at the Saudi consulate in [[Istanbul]], for perceived disloyalty to the state.

+

The summit stars included MBS, Sullivan, and Volodymyr Zelensky. Russia was not invited to the summit. It included a handful of heads of state from the fewer than fifty nations that sent delegates. ''Reuters'' reported that Zelensky’s goal was to get international support for “the principles” that he will consider as a basis for the settlement of the war, including “the withdrawal of all Russian troops and the return of all Ukrainian territory.” Russia’s formal response came from Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs [[Sergei Ryabkov]] who called the summit “a reflection of [[the West]]’s attempt to continue futile, doomed efforts” to mobilize the Global South behind Zelensky. [[India]] and [[China]] both sent delegations to the session. An American intelligence official told Hersh,

+

{{quotebox-float|“Jeddah was Sullivan’s baby. He planned it to be Biden’s equivalent of [[Woodrow Wilson|[President Woodrow] Wilson]]’s [[Versailles Conference|Versailles]]. The grand alliance of the free world meeting in a victory celebration after the humiliating defeat of the hated foe to determine the shape of nations for the next generation. Fame and Glory. Promotion and re-election. The jewel in the crown was to be Zelensky’s achievement of Putin’s unconditional surrender after the lightning spring offensive. They were even planning a [[Nuremberg Trials|Nuremberg type trial]] at the [[World Court|world court]], with Jake as our representative. Just one more f***-up, but who is counting? Forty nations showed up, all but six looking for free food after the Odessa shutdown,”}}

+

referring to President Putin’s curtailment of Ukrainian wheat shipments in response to Zelensky’s renewed attacks on the [[Crimean bridge]] linking Crimea to the Russian mainland.<ref>https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/summer-of-the-hawks</ref>

==Rape of Afghanistan==

Line 27: Line 127:

:'''Sullivan.''' This is, ah, I think, a very good example of the difficult choices a president faces and a secretary of defense and secretary of state and national security adviser face in the context of the end of a 20-year war. Those Blackhawks were not given to the Taliban they were given to the Afghan National Security forces to be able to defend themselves at the specific request to President Ghani who came to the Oval Office and asked for additional air capability among other things. So the president had a choice he could not give it to them with the risk that it would fall into the Taliban's hands eventually or he could give it to them with the hope that they could deploy it in service of defending their country. Both of those options had risks he had to choose and he made a choice and from the point of view of that, uh, particular narrow example to a, for a, much wider range of examples that we contend with at the end of the day what the president has focused on all the way through here is trying to take the information that's been presented to him, the risks, costs and benefits of,<ref>"Cost-benefit analysis is a Republican spending reform of the Reagan era.</ref> and make decisions that were in the best national security interests of the American people. He has tried to do that. He talked about that at length yesterday, uh, and from that perspective, he believes the decision he made in this context was the right decision.<ref>https://therightscoop.com/nsa-jake-sullivan-says-the-taliban-has-a-fair-amount-of-our-weapons-and-they-probably-wont-give-them-back-video/</ref>

−

==~~Not~~ fit to lead==

+

==China: 'not fit to lead'==

[[File:Yang Jiechi Antony Blinken.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Central Foreign Affairs Commission director [[Yang Jiechi]] to Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken: "The United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength.”<ref>https://www.waynedupree.com/2021/03/biden-china-us-argument-alaska/</ref>]]

In Sullivan's 's first meeting with Communist Chinese bosses, Director of the CCP Central Foreign Affairs Commission Yang Jiechi instructed Sullivan and [[Anthony Blinken]],

Line 100: Line 200:

==External link==

*[https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2020/05/js51.pdf INTERVIEW OF: JAKE SULLIVAN], EXECUTIVE SESSION PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WASHINGTON, D.C., Thursday, December 21, 2017 Washington, D.C.

−

+

*[https://peterbeinart.substack.com/p/jake-sullivans-mental-prison-a-sequel Jake Sullivan's Mental Prison (A Sequel)]

−

[[Category:Democrats]][[Category:Hillary Clinton Advisors]][[Category:Clinton Scandals]][[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]][[Category:Conspiracy Theorists]][[Category:Russophobia]][[Category:Biden Putsch]][[Category:Biden Junta]][[Category:Russia-Ukraine War]][[Category:Fascism]][[Category:2010s]][[Category:2020s]]

+

[[Category:Democrats]][[Category:Hillary Clinton Advisors]][[Category:Clinton Scandals]][[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]][[Category:Conspiracy Theorists]][[Category:Russophobia]][[Category:Biden Putsch]][[Category:Biden Junta]][[Category:Russia-Ukraine War]][[Category:Warmongers]][[Category:Fascism]][[Category:2010s]][[Category:2020s]]

RobSmith

Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template

292,485

edits

Changes

Jake Sullivan (view source)

Revision as of 02:32, July 15, 2026

Navigation menu

Search