| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | == Examples == | | == Examples == |
| | #Ask [[Google]], "What is [[conversion therapy]]?", then click on its AI Mode, and it responds with [[liberal]] falsehoods, including "Many conversion therapy practices are considered dangerous and ineffective ...." In fact, conversion therapy has been helpful to many who struggle with unwanted [[transgender]] ideation or [[homosexual]] attraction. By spewing this falsehood, [[AI]] is aligned with [[liberal censorship]], even though [[SCOTUS]] is likely to rule in favor of conversion therapy in an upcoming case there during its [[Supreme Court 2025 Term]]. | | #Ask [[Google]], "What is [[conversion therapy]]?", then click on its AI Mode, and it responds with [[liberal]] falsehoods, including "Many conversion therapy practices are considered dangerous and ineffective ...." In fact, conversion therapy has been helpful to many who struggle with unwanted [[transgender]] ideation or [[homosexual]] attraction. By spewing this falsehood, [[AI]] is aligned with [[liberal censorship]], even though [[SCOTUS]] is likely to rule in favor of conversion therapy in an upcoming case there during its [[Supreme Court 2025 Term]]. |
| − | #Ask Google, "did Jesus write the Epistle to the Hebrews," and its AI program responds, "No, scholars generally agree that Jesus did not write the Epistle to the Hebrews." But no scholars have addressed whether [[Jesus]] wrote it, and no other author capable of writing this masterpiece has been plausibly identified. See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews]]? | + | #Ask Google, "did Jesus write the Epistle to the Hebrews," and its AI program responds, "No, scholars generally agree that Jesus did not write the Epistle to the Hebrews." But no scholars have addressed whether [[Jesus]] wrote it, and no other author capable of writing this masterpiece has been plausibly identified. See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews]]? Google AI shows its bias by responding to question if anyone suggests that Jesus wrote this Epistle by saying, "a highly obscure, fringe theory proposing Jesus as the author does exist on alternative platforms like Conservapedia." |
| | #Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains: | | #Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains: |
| | {{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}} | | {{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}} |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | <li value="8">Ask Google AI if [[Justin Bieber]] is [[pro-life]], and AI quotes from Bieber but omits the strong middle sentence that Bieber recognizes that an embryo is human: "I really don't believe in abortion. I think an embryo is a human. It's like killing a baby."<ref>From Bieber's interview with ''Rolling Stone'' in 2011.</ref> | | <li value="8">Ask Google AI if [[Justin Bieber]] is [[pro-life]], and AI quotes from Bieber but omits the strong middle sentence that Bieber recognizes that an embryo is human: "I really don't believe in abortion. I think an embryo is a human. It's like killing a baby."<ref>From Bieber's interview with ''Rolling Stone'' in 2011.</ref> |
| | <li value="9">Ask Google AI if the presidential [[Pardon Power|pardon power]] can extend to state crimes, and without authority it flatly and falsely denies this possibility (which has been successfully done) as does [[liberal]] [[Wikipedia]].</ol> | | <li value="9">Ask Google AI if the presidential [[Pardon Power|pardon power]] can extend to state crimes, and without authority it flatly and falsely denies this possibility (which has been successfully done) as does [[liberal]] [[Wikipedia]].</ol> |
| | + | |
| | == See also == | | == See also == |
| | * [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/comparing-google-bard-with-openais-chatgpt-on-political-bias-facts-and-morality/ Darrell M. West, "Comparing Google Bard with OpenAI’s ChatGPT on political bias, facts, and morality," Brookings Institute (Mar. 23, 2023)] | | * [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/comparing-google-bard-with-openais-chatgpt-on-political-bias-facts-and-morality/ Darrell M. West, "Comparing Google Bard with OpenAI’s ChatGPT on political bias, facts, and morality," Brookings Institute (Mar. 23, 2023)] |