| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | == Examples == | | == Examples == |
| | #Ask [[Google]], "What is [[conversion therapy]]?", then click on its AI Mode, and it responds with [[liberal]] falsehoods, including "Many conversion therapy practices are considered dangerous and ineffective ...." In fact, conversion therapy has been helpful to many who struggle with unwanted [[transgender]] ideation or [[homosexual]] attraction. By spewing this falsehood, [[AI]] is aligned with [[liberal censorship]], even though [[SCOTUS]] is likely to rule in favor of conversion therapy in an upcoming case there during its [[Supreme Court 2025 Term]]. | | #Ask [[Google]], "What is [[conversion therapy]]?", then click on its AI Mode, and it responds with [[liberal]] falsehoods, including "Many conversion therapy practices are considered dangerous and ineffective ...." In fact, conversion therapy has been helpful to many who struggle with unwanted [[transgender]] ideation or [[homosexual]] attraction. By spewing this falsehood, [[AI]] is aligned with [[liberal censorship]], even though [[SCOTUS]] is likely to rule in favor of conversion therapy in an upcoming case there during its [[Supreme Court 2025 Term]]. |
| − | #Ask Google, "did Jesus write the Epistle to the Hebrews," and its AI program responds, "No, scholars generally agree that Jesus did not write the Epistle to the Hebrews." But no scholars have addressed whether [[Jesus]] wrote it, and no other author capable of writing this masterpiece has been plausibly identified. See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews]]? Google AI shows its bias by responding to question if anyone suggests that Jesus wrote this Epistle by saying, "a highly obscure, fringe theory proposing Jesus as the author does exist on alternative platforms like Conservapedia." | + | #Ask Google, "did Jesus write the Epistle to the Hebrews," and its AI program responds, "No, scholars generally agree that Jesus did not write the Epistle to the Hebrews." But no scholars have addressed whether [[Jesus]] wrote it, and no other author capable of writing this masterpiece has been plausibly identified. See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews]]? Google AI shows its bias by responding to the question if anyone suggests that Jesus wrote this Epistle by saying, "a highly obscure, fringe theory proposing Jesus as the author does exist on alternative platforms like Conservapedia." |
| − | #Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains: | + | #Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok if there are any [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]] and Grok completely denies it, while relying entirely on the implausible assumptions of [[radiometric dating]] (and not admitting its reliance on assumptions). |
| − | {{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}}
| |
| | <ol><li value="4">Ask Google's AI mode: abortion "breast cancer", and it falsely states "Current scientific evidence does not support a link between induced abortion (elective abortion) and an increased risk of breast cancer," when the evidence for a link is overwhelming and proven by studies dating back many decades. | | <ol><li value="4">Ask Google's AI mode: abortion "breast cancer", and it falsely states "Current scientific evidence does not support a link between induced abortion (elective abortion) and an increased risk of breast cancer," when the evidence for a link is overwhelming and proven by studies dating back many decades. |
| | <li value="5">Google AI falsely states, "The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in [Wong Kim Ark's] favor in 1898, establishing that anyone born within the US, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status, is a US citizen." The Supreme Court held nothing of this sort. Instead, it held that someone born in the U.S. to legal permanent residents in the U.S. who also held citizenship in [[China]], is a U.S. citizen. | | <li value="5">Google AI falsely states, "The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in [Wong Kim Ark's] favor in 1898, establishing that anyone born within the US, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status, is a US citizen." The Supreme Court held nothing of this sort. Instead, it held that someone born in the U.S. to legal permanent residents in the U.S. who also held citizenship in [[China]], is a U.S. citizen. |