Difference between revisions of "Greenpeace"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Baby905 (Talk); changed back to last version by TK)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Greenpeace''' is an [[environmentalist]] group that seeks to ban commercial [[whaling]] and stop nuclear testing (see [[nuclear test ban treaty]]).
 
'''Greenpeace''' is an [[environmentalist]] group that seeks to ban commercial [[whaling]] and stop nuclear testing (see [[nuclear test ban treaty]]).
 
[[Image:40607437 ark1 afp203body.jpg|right|thumb|Greenpeace activists building an [[Ark]].]]
 
[[Image:40607437 ark1 afp203body.jpg|right|thumb|Greenpeace activists building an [[Ark]].]]
 +
It has been accused of manipulating public opinion in a way that would be ordinarily be condemned (see [[double standard]]):
 +
*Greenpeace has escaped public censure by hiding behind the mask of its “non-profit” status and its U.S. tax exemption. ... Forbes magazine once described it as “a skillfully managed business” with full command of “the tools of direct mail and image manipulation -- and tactics that would bring instant condemnation if practiced by a for-profit corporation.” [http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/131]
 +
Environmental groups like Greenpeace have boasted that they have blocked more than 200 hydroelectric projects in the developing world over the past two decades.
 +
==External links==
 +
*[http://www.greenpeace.org The Greenpeace International homepage]
 +
*[http://www.attacreport.com/ar_terror/tframe.php?region=namerica&group=gp ATTAC Report]
 +
 +
 +
[[category:liberal activists]]
 +
[[Category: Environmental Terrorism]]

Revision as of 23:33, July 10, 2007

Greenpeace is an environmentalist group that seeks to ban commercial whaling and stop nuclear testing (see nuclear test ban treaty).

Greenpeace activists building an Ark.

It has been accused of manipulating public opinion in a way that would be ordinarily be condemned (see double standard):

  • Greenpeace has escaped public censure by hiding behind the mask of its “non-profit” status and its U.S. tax exemption. ... Forbes magazine once described it as “a skillfully managed business” with full command of “the tools of direct mail and image manipulation -- and tactics that would bring instant condemnation if practiced by a for-profit corporation.” [1]

Environmental groups like Greenpeace have boasted that they have blocked more than 200 hydroelectric projects in the developing world over the past two decades.

External links