Difference between revisions of "Army"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(img)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Much of military strategy in the immediately pre-modern era centered around the question of whether or not it is preferable to maintain a "standing army" - that is, a group of soldiers ready to be "mobilized" at a moment's notice to fight for the country, functioning additionally as deterrence.  Standing armies are exorbitantly expensive to maintain.  Now, most countries maintain a small standing army, but nuclear powers rely on nuclear warheads to maintain deterrence in large part.
 
Much of military strategy in the immediately pre-modern era centered around the question of whether or not it is preferable to maintain a "standing army" - that is, a group of soldiers ready to be "mobilized" at a moment's notice to fight for the country, functioning additionally as deterrence.  Standing armies are exorbitantly expensive to maintain.  Now, most countries maintain a small standing army, but nuclear powers rely on nuclear warheads to maintain deterrence in large part.
  
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[British Army]]
 +
*[[United States Army]]
 
[[Category:Military]]
 
[[Category:Military]]

Revision as of 21:10, July 13, 2007

British Army infantry on maneouvres

An army is a group of ground soldiers under the command of a general. Armies were the main method of combat between kingdoms in the pre-modern era.

Much of military strategy in the immediately pre-modern era centered around the question of whether or not it is preferable to maintain a "standing army" - that is, a group of soldiers ready to be "mobilized" at a moment's notice to fight for the country, functioning additionally as deterrence. Standing armies are exorbitantly expensive to maintain. Now, most countries maintain a small standing army, but nuclear powers rely on nuclear warheads to maintain deterrence in large part.

See also