Difference between revisions of "User talk:Scorpio"

Revision as of 22:00, July 14, 2007

Welcome to my Discussion Page.

Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.

I'm delighted to be able to contribute to Conservapedia and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia.

If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you

Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or start a new topic.

RobS comments

Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing. RobS 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)

Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, "VENONA files & Other Security/Loyalty Risks". There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the "+" tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. Scorpio 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia:Image upload requests

You can just place them here. RobS 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Uploading privileges

You have uploading privileges now. Thanks for your contributions.--Aschlafly 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Aschlafly, thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. Scorpio 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

mediation

I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. Geo.^Complain! 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:

He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.

It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. Scorpio 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. Geo.^Complain! 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p Scorpio 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Andrew Roth

Hey, what do you kow about Andrew Roth? This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6). That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic. Care to collaborate? RobS 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this article that may help you in your research. Scorpio 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons. The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI. Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization that was not penetrated, yet Nigel West & others cite Roth as a KGB boy. RobS 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? Scorpio 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review. That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.

The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy. These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up. McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment. Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive. RobS 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 :::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)
-::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current dacade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.
+::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.
 ::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)