Difference between revisions of "Talk:Breast Exam"
DoggerelBank (talk | contribs) (Sorry-I'll keep debate here from now on.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This is not an article about gynaecology or oncology. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 21:31, 16 July 2007 (EDT) | This is not an article about gynaecology or oncology. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 21:31, 16 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | Sorry, I'm not helping by spreading my debate all over the site - I just wrote a response to you on your Talk page [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Fox&curid=26454&diff=236895&oldid=236867]. | ||
It's not an article ABOUT oncology, but oncology - and the desire to avoid dealing with it - is the raison d'etre for the breast exam, and since this article deals with risk factors, what's the harm of a sentence on an important aspect? [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 21:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT) | It's not an article ABOUT oncology, but oncology - and the desire to avoid dealing with it - is the raison d'etre for the breast exam, and since this article deals with risk factors, what's the harm of a sentence on an important aspect? [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 21:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:35, July 17, 2007
Cancer?!?!?
What about the proven links between breast cancer and abortions? Surely that shouple be at least mentioned in this article? PFoster 21:26, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
Absolutely PF. Fox not only reverted my additions - which were referenced fully on the Abortion article, but has locked the page! Information that's already on CP is missing here! DoggerelBank 21:29, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
- Why does it belong in this article? Bohdan 21:29, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
This is not an article about gynaecology or oncology. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 21:31, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
Sorry, I'm not helping by spreading my debate all over the site - I just wrote a response to you on your Talk page [1].
It's not an article ABOUT oncology, but oncology - and the desire to avoid dealing with it - is the raison d'etre for the breast exam, and since this article deals with risk factors, what's the harm of a sentence on an important aspect? PFoster 21:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT)