Difference between revisions of "Newly discovered evidence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Newly discovered evidence is the basis for many motions by criminal defendants to obtain a new trial. There are formidable legal doctrines, however, that prevent defendants from obtaini...) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) (categorize) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There are formidable legal doctrines, however, that prevent defendants from obtaining a new trial even if they prove that a key witness against them committed perjury. For example, the "[v]eracity of witnesses may not be tested for a second time and by an appellate tribunal." ''United States v. Rutkin'', 208 F.2d 647, 654 (3d Cir. 1953). If the defendant challenged a witness's testimony at the first trial, then this doctrine precludes the defendant from challenging it again in a request for a new trial, even if newly discovered evidence proves the lie. | There are formidable legal doctrines, however, that prevent defendants from obtaining a new trial even if they prove that a key witness against them committed perjury. For example, the "[v]eracity of witnesses may not be tested for a second time and by an appellate tribunal." ''United States v. Rutkin'', 208 F.2d 647, 654 (3d Cir. 1953). If the defendant challenged a witness's testimony at the first trial, then this doctrine precludes the defendant from challenging it again in a request for a new trial, even if newly discovered evidence proves the lie. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[category:United States law]] | ||
Revision as of 15:53, August 1, 2007
Newly discovered evidence is the basis for many motions by criminal defendants to obtain a new trial.
There are formidable legal doctrines, however, that prevent defendants from obtaining a new trial even if they prove that a key witness against them committed perjury. For example, the "[v]eracity of witnesses may not be tested for a second time and by an appellate tribunal." United States v. Rutkin, 208 F.2d 647, 654 (3d Cir. 1953). If the defendant challenged a witness's testimony at the first trial, then this doctrine precludes the defendant from challenging it again in a request for a new trial, even if newly discovered evidence proves the lie.