Difference between revisions of "Talk:Young Earth Creationism"

Revision as of 22:32, August 2, 2007

!

Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism.
Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop.

Archive 1

15. Too few Supernovas

This section actually discusses comets, not supernovas. I thought I should point this out. Learn together 13:52, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Thanks, I made the correction. I have been doing some work on this article in the last two days and I saw your comment on this page. Conservative 17:54, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Glad I could help. ;-) Learn together 17:55, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ::Thanks, I made the correction.  I have been doing some work on this article in the last two days and I saw your comment on this page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:54, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 :::Glad I could help. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:55, 2 July 2007 (EDT)
-== Idiocy ==
-This page might just be the funniest thing I've read in a while:
-. Human population growth
-    "If humans had been around more than a few thousand years, they would have populated the earth more quickly."
-.  Only recently known civilizations
-    "Earliest known civilizations are only a few thousand years old."
-The Young Earth Creationism hypothesis is a joke, just like this whole wiki. You state that "Everything you post must be true and verifiable", yet one look at any of your articles prove that it's just empty words. Everybody except true morons realize that this "encyclopedia" is complete bullocks. My account will probably be banned because of this post, but that will only prove that you can't take any criticism. --[[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 13:58, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Young Earth Creationism"

Revision as of 22:32, August 2, 2007

15. Too few Supernovas

Navigation menu

Search