Difference between revisions of "Talk:People's Republic of China"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Blackjuice (Talk); changed back to last version by Lordration)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
About History I think That we should have much more including a list of dynasties (it would be really nice if we could have a section about each one).
 
About History I think That we should have much more including a list of dynasties (it would be really nice if we could have a section about each one).
 
Also the amount of space we give to each article is not at all even we should have a link to another article talking about the Leader and much more about the Government in General. Lord Ration
 
Also the amount of space we give to each article is not at all even we should have a link to another article talking about the Leader and much more about the Government in General. Lord Ration
−
: There are articles on several dynasties already, and although it is far from complete and many of the articles are/were wrong, I have done my best so far to amend some of the existing ones.  As for the overall content in articles, there are far fewer editors on this site than on W........, and the knowledge about China, for instance, is more limited, so there is little point creating empty articles about subjects that are unlikely to be filled any time soon. [[User:Blackjuice|Blackjuice]] 13:54, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 21:47, August 4, 2007

I merged the "China" article into this one. Better form and no point in having 2 articles.--Elamdri 01:59, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

You have got to be joking. This infantile 1 page drivel is the result of "merging" 2 articles? And you go to University??!! Where you do politics and philosophy. You could write everything about China here on a single lavatory tile.
All you have done is deleted my excellent critique of this mess. You should stop any 12 year old in the street and give him $10 and he/she will do better than this. --MylesP 19:59, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Doesn't the PRC refer to Taiwan? Man, it's confusing. GodlessLiberal 15:08, 29 April 2007 (EDT)

Nevermind. Should there be some sort of clarification in this article about the PRC/ROC naming debate? Like, how each got its name during the Chinese Civil War? GodlessLiberal 15:09, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
The Chinese claim Taiwan, but Taiwan claims independence and the US backs it.--Elamdri 02:36, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
The US definitely does not back Taiwan, and Taiwan does not claim independence. Actually, Taiwanese independence is one of the 4 noes - si bu - that the administration on Taiwan promise not to ever claim so long as the PRC doesn't threaten the ROC. And in fact, the Republic of China claims the whole of mainland China, as well as Tibet AND the republic of Mongolia, which is not claimed by the PRC. By the way, there are also several kinds of concept called "Taiwanese independence".
- that is complete nonsense.

About History I think That we should have much more including a list of dynasties (it would be really nice if we could have a section about each one). Also the amount of space we give to each article is not at all even we should have a link to another article talking about the Leader and much more about the Government in General. Lord Ration