Difference between revisions of "Lemon v. Kurtzman"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(There was no liberal bias)
m (Reverted edits by Autofire (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{caselaw|Lemon vs. Kurtzman|403 U.S. 602|1971}}
 
{{caselaw|Lemon vs. Kurtzman|403 U.S. 602|1971}}
  
'''Lemon vs. Kurtzman''' (1971) was a landmark [[Supreme Court]] case iterating a strong test for [[separation of church and state]] under the [[First Amendment]].
+
'''Lemon v. Kurtzman''' (1971) was a landmark, [[liberal]] [[Supreme Court]] decision imposing a test for [[separation of church and state]] under the [[First Amendment]] that is hostile to almost any religious expression on [[government]] property.
  
 
Under the "Lemon Test," to pass constitutional muster as a law that does not violate the [[Establishment Clause]], a law must:
 
Under the "Lemon Test," to pass constitutional muster as a law that does not violate the [[Establishment Clause]], a law must:
Line 7: Line 7:
 
# Not have the primary effect of either inhibiting or advancing religion, and,
 
# Not have the primary effect of either inhibiting or advancing religion, and,
 
# Not promote excessive entanglement between church & state.
 
# Not promote excessive entanglement between church & state.
 +
 +
Any law can be invalidated on any one of the above three requirements of the Lemon Test.
  
 
The "Lemon Test" was the one applied to invalidate the Dover School Board's [[intelligent design]] policy in ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District]].''
 
The "Lemon Test" was the one applied to invalidate the Dover School Board's [[intelligent design]] policy in ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District]].''

Revision as of 03:55, August 6, 2007

Lemon vs. Kurtzman
403 U.S. 602
Decided: 1971

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) was a landmark, liberal Supreme Court decision imposing a test for separation of church and state under the First Amendment that is hostile to almost any religious expression on government property.

Under the "Lemon Test," to pass constitutional muster as a law that does not violate the Establishment Clause, a law must:

  1. Have a legitimate secular purpose, and,
  2. Not have the primary effect of either inhibiting or advancing religion, and,
  3. Not promote excessive entanglement between church & state.

Any law can be invalidated on any one of the above three requirements of the Lemon Test.

The "Lemon Test" was the one applied to invalidate the Dover School Board's intelligent design policy in Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District.