Difference between revisions of "Talk:SiCKO"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(should this section be added to the article?)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Embargo Investigation==
 
==Embargo Investigation==
−
I've noticed that this article does not cover SiCKO's embargo violation investigation[http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/1118621]. I've written a section on it, but the page is locked to edits. Should I post it here in the discussion page and have a Sysop put it into the article if they see fit? Thanks, --[[User:Tash|Tash]] 15:17, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
I've noticed that this article does not cover SiCKO's embargo violation investigation[http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/1118621]. I've written a section on it:
 +
 
 +
<small>The production of SiKO has brought about a controversy concerning Moore’s adherence to the [[United States]] broad trade embargo imposed against [[Cuba]] since 1962.  A United States Treasury Department letter implied that Moore did not receive authorization before traveling to Cuba to film his documentary; this would be in direct conflict with the embargo’s rules<ref> http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/1118621</ref>. Moore is now facing a U.S. government probe on the legality of the Cuba trip<ref> http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/05/11/1920233.htm</ref>. He has hired a Washington attorney, David Boies, to represent him in the matter, and states, "I have broken no laws, and I have nothing to hide.”<ref> http://au.news.yahoo.com/070510/2/13f42.html</ref></small>
 +
 
 +
Should it be added?
 +
--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 15:17, 3 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:32, August 7, 2007

Aschlafly - You have such a strong opinion on this film that is still being shown in previews. Have you even seen it? Guitarplayer 16:50, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

He may have. Its now available on the internet. Geo.Complain! 17:26, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Michael Moore's films: garbage in, garbage out. How often does Sicko talk about rationing that results from government-controlled medicine???--Aschlafly 20:04, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

Front page news

I find it amusing that the front page tells people that Sicko was critically panned but the article itself only features a quote from a critic lauding the movie. I'd ask someone to change the front page if I could to reflect the actual article. Anyway, I've seen the movie. It makes a powerful case - not so much that other countries' healthcare systems are better but rather that our system's failings are much worse. The "Let's do something less bad than this" is a good argument, and the case is made well. --TraitortotheCause 15:30, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

Embargo Investigation

I've noticed that this article does not cover SiCKO's embargo violation investigation[1]. I've written a section on it:

The production of SiKO has brought about a controversy concerning Moore’s adherence to the United States broad trade embargo imposed against Cuba since 1962. A United States Treasury Department letter implied that Moore did not receive authorization before traveling to Cuba to film his documentary; this would be in direct conflict with the embargo’s rules[1]. Moore is now facing a U.S. government probe on the legality of the Cuba trip[2]. He has hired a Washington attorney, David Boies, to represent him in the matter, and states, "I have broken no laws, and I have nothing to hide.”[3]

Should it be added? --Tash 15:17, 3 August 2007 (EDT)