Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charles Sumner"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: It's a valid quote.  Let's not delete true information here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:27, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
: It's a valid quote.  Let's not delete true information here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:27, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
::All the quote is showing is that he was a deep Christian. That is already stated in the article; why do we need a quote to further solidify it? [[User:GofG|GofG]] 17:37, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:37, March 11, 2007

There is very little reason to have the quote there, as it is not only pro-christian, but anti-"false" religions, which is not a good thing. I will remove it if no one can give me a reason to have it. GofG 17:25, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

It's a valid quote. Let's not delete true information here.--Aschlafly 17:27, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
All the quote is showing is that he was a deep Christian. That is already stated in the article; why do we need a quote to further solidify it? GofG 17:37, 11 March 2007 (EDT)