Difference between revisions of "Essay:Reversible Court Decisions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The replacement of moderate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor by conservative Justice Samuel Alito makes it possible to overturn the following liberal ...) |
(adding another decision that can now be overruled) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
#[[Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock]], 489 U.S. 1 (1989), a 6-3 decision invalidating a tax exemption limited to the sale of religious literature by religious organizations as preferential support of religion in violation of the [[Establishment Clause]]; Marshall and O'Connor were since replaced by Thomas and Alito. | #[[Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock]], 489 U.S. 1 (1989), a 6-3 decision invalidating a tax exemption limited to the sale of religious literature by religious organizations as preferential support of religion in violation of the [[Establishment Clause]]; Marshall and O'Connor were since replaced by Thomas and Alito. | ||
| + | #''[[Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed.]]'', a 5-4 decision establishing a cause of action for retaliation under [[Title IX]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[Essay:Reversible Court Decisions]] | ||
[[category:essay]] | [[category:essay]] | ||
[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:US Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 18:05, August 9, 2007
The replacement of moderate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor by conservative Justice Samuel Alito makes it possible to overturn the following liberal Court decisions:
- Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1 (1989), a 6-3 decision invalidating a tax exemption limited to the sale of religious literature by religious organizations as preferential support of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause; Marshall and O'Connor were since replaced by Thomas and Alito.
- Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed., a 5-4 decision establishing a cause of action for retaliation under Title IX