Difference between revisions of "Talk:USS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Part of the name?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of [[USS Arizona (BB-39)]].  While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
 
I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of [[USS Arizona (BB-39)]].  While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-[[User:Tir|Tir]]

Revision as of 01:47, August 15, 2007

I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of USS Arizona (BB-39). While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --Rutm 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-Tir