Difference between revisions of "Talk:USS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-[[User:Tir|Tir]]
 
I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-[[User:Tir|Tir]]
 +
 +
*USS = ''United States Ship''.  It is therefore part of the name, but prefix, nonetheless. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:20, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 03:20, August 15, 2007

I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of USS Arizona (BB-39). While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --Rutm 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-Tir

  • USS = United States Ship. It is therefore part of the name, but prefix, nonetheless. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 23:20, 14 August 2007 (EDT)