Difference between revisions of "Intra-circuit conflict"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The U.S. Supreme Court rejects certiorari jurisdiction based on an issue concerning intra-circuit conflict: *''Wisniewski v. United States'', 353 U.S. 901, 902 (1957) (per curiam)...) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to become involved. | The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to become involved. | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
[[category:Federal Procedure]] | [[category:Federal Procedure]] | ||
Revision as of 15:24, August 23, 2007
The U.S. Supreme Court rejects certiorari jurisdiction based on an issue concerning intra-circuit conflict:
- Wisniewski v. United States, 353 U.S. 901, 902 (1957) (per curiam);
- Davis v. United States, 417 U.S. 333, 340 (1974) (certiorari not warranted despite conceded intra-circuit conflict on meaning of criminal statute).
The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the U.S. Supreme Court to become involved.