Difference between revisions of "Buckhannon Bd. and Home Care, Inc. v. West Va. Dep't of Health and Human Res."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Buckhannon Bd. & Home Care, Inc. v. West Va. Dep't of Health & Human Res. moved to Buckhannon Bd. and Home Care, Inc. v. West Va. Dep't of Health and Human Res.: Ampersands prevent browsers loading) |
(moved cat) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In ''Buckhannon Bd. & Home Care, Inc. v. West Va. Dep't of Health & Human Res.'', 532 U.S. 598, 602 (2001), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] emphasized that courts generally may not depart from the "American rule" against fee-shifting in lawsuits "absent explicit statutory authority." | In ''Buckhannon Bd. & Home Care, Inc. v. West Va. Dep't of Health & Human Res.'', 532 U.S. 598, 602 (2001), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] emphasized that courts generally may not depart from the "American rule" against fee-shifting in lawsuits "absent explicit statutory authority." | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
Revision as of 05:04, August 24, 2007
In Buckhannon Bd. & Home Care, Inc. v. West Va. Dep't of Health & Human Res., 532 U.S. 598, 602 (2001), the U.S. Supreme Court emphasized that courts generally may not depart from the "American rule" against fee-shifting in lawsuits "absent explicit statutory authority."