Difference between revisions of "Whitney v Heckler"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: In ''Whitney v. Heckler'', a group of physicians challenged the constitutionality of the Deficit Reduction Act, which imposed a temporary freeze on the fees that non-participating phys...)
(No difference)

Revision as of 23:02, September 6, 2007

In Whitney v. Heckler, a group of physicians challenged the constitutionality of the Deficit Reduction Act, which imposed a temporary freeze on the fees that non-participating physicians could charge Medicare patients. The Eleventh Circuit held that this freeze did not violate substantive due process based on its findings that:

  • it bore a reasonable relation to a valid legislative purpose
  • it was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory
  • it was not a bill of attainder because it did not inflict punishment on the plaintiff physicians.