Difference between revisions of "Forfeiture"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(significant addition)
m (Undeadened)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
A forfeiture is a cancellation in contract law.  Most commonly a forfeiture is a legal action whereby a contract purchaser following default loses all his interest in the property.  
+
A '''forfeiture''' is a cancellation in contract [[law]].  Most commonly a forfeiture is a legal action whereby a [[contract]] purchaser following default loses all his interest in the [[property]].  
  
 
In litigation forfeiture has a different meaning.  Forfeiture in a trial is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right.  This is contrasted with waiver, which is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.  This distinction is important, because a right that is waived is lost on appeal unless there is proof that the waiver was defective, but a right that is forfeited may be the subject of an assertion of plain error on appeal (for overturning the trial decision).<ref>''Sherron v. Mississippi'', 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 832 (Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2006)</ref>
 
In litigation forfeiture has a different meaning.  Forfeiture in a trial is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right.  This is contrasted with waiver, which is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.  This distinction is important, because a right that is waived is lost on appeal unless there is proof that the waiver was defective, but a right that is forfeited may be the subject of an assertion of plain error on appeal (for overturning the trial decision).<ref>''Sherron v. Mississippi'', 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 832 (Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2006)</ref>

Revision as of 11:18, September 7, 2007

A forfeiture is a cancellation in contract law. Most commonly a forfeiture is a legal action whereby a contract purchaser following default loses all his interest in the property.

In litigation forfeiture has a different meaning. Forfeiture in a trial is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right. This is contrasted with waiver, which is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right. This distinction is important, because a right that is waived is lost on appeal unless there is proof that the waiver was defective, but a right that is forfeited may be the subject of an assertion of plain error on appeal (for overturning the trial decision).[1]

References

  1. ↑ Sherron v. Mississippi, 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 832 (Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2006)