Difference between revisions of "Talk:Simon Greenleaf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(You're right, but...) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Jenkins, he is referencing two different parts. If you can find a narrowed down citation, that would help, otherwise I would leave it. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 19:52, 20 September 2007 (EDT) | *Jenkins, he is referencing two different parts. If you can find a narrowed down citation, that would help, otherwise I would leave it. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 19:52, 20 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Quite correct. However, both pages print the entire thing. The first page simply adds a small blurb at the beginning. So it doesn't really change anything if the last thing pointed at the same source as the first one, other than my suggestion making things more concise and avoiding redundancy. But if you prefer, I can look up other sources for the second sentence. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:57, 20 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:57, September 20, 2007
Is the entire first paragraph meant to be italicized? DanH 17:09, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- This happened yesterday too and it took a while to fix. I don't know what is happening. I will look at it again today. Conservative
There are currently two reference links to full texts of the Testimony. Unless there is a special reason, I suggest we change the last reference to the first one. --Jenkins 17:22, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- Jenkins, he is referencing two different parts. If you can find a narrowed down citation, that would help, otherwise I would leave it. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 19:52, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
- Quite correct. However, both pages print the entire thing. The first page simply adds a small blurb at the beginning. So it doesn't really change anything if the last thing pointed at the same source as the first one, other than my suggestion making things more concise and avoiding redundancy. But if you prefer, I can look up other sources for the second sentence. --Jenkins 19:57, 20 September 2007 (EDT)