Difference between revisions of "Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SkipJohnson (talk | contribs) (New page: '''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District''' was a federal court case in which activist judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent design was creationism. Jones wrote tha...) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) m (categorize) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District''' was a federal court case in which activist judge [[John E. Jones III]] ruled that [[Intelligent design]] was [[creationism]]. Jones wrote that Intelligent Design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents". The [[Discovery Institute]] found that in his decision Jones has copied verbatim from the [[ACLU]]'s proposed findings of fact. | '''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District''' was a federal court case in which activist judge [[John E. Jones III]] ruled that [[Intelligent design]] was [[creationism]]. Jones wrote that Intelligent Design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents". The [[Discovery Institute]] found that in his decision Jones has copied verbatim from the [[ACLU]]'s proposed findings of fact. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[category:United States Law]] | ||
Revision as of 16:51, September 21, 2007
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District was a federal court case in which activist judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent design was creationism. Jones wrote that Intelligent Design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents". The Discovery Institute found that in his decision Jones has copied verbatim from the ACLU's proposed findings of fact.