User talk:SkipJohnson

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, SkipJohnson, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, SkipJohnson!

şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 22:29, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

I suspect that you're trying to be funny, but Jay Leno has nothing to fear from you. We know that recent dates are in "AD". Improve your quality to the high level here, or expect to have your account blocked. Thanks and Godspeed.--Aschlafly 13:57, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

categorizing articles

Hi! :)

Thanks for adding a new article. Please, though, categorize your articles when you create them; while there are those of us who will go through and clean-up the uncategorized articles, you know your subject better than we do.

For a list of categories, go here: Special:Categories. To add a category to your article, type two open brackets, then "category:" followed by the category you want. Just add two closed brackets and you're done! You can add as many categories as you feel are appropriate. Thanks!


I'm just curious what label you would use to describe the KKK, because I don't think "liberal" quite matches up either. I'll give you that it's confusing and probably inaccurate to call them "conservative" going by the modern layperson understanding of the term, but by a strict application of political theory they would be considered an extreme far-right organization.--Porthos 13:21, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

  • I disagree. Liberals employ deceit, and so does groups like the KKK. Just as it has been proven that the Nazi's were not "right-wing", I think all you are doing, Porthos, is repeating something that was a fallacy to begin with. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 15:23, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

Sexual continence

Could you please explain me this edition?:

13:59, 20 September 2007 SkipJohnson (Talk | contribs | block) (removing liberal propagandad)

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 22:22, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

I misinterpreted the quote. My apologies. SkipJohnson 14:36, 24 September 2007 (EDT)


Thanks for being so alert. My IM is listed on my page, and that is usually faster than posting on pages here. ;-) --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 17:00, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

Skip, thanks for your insights and contributions. You've been promoted to have blocking powers. Use them often with the batch of morons who just entered Wednesday night after watching Comedy Central!--Aschlafly 23:18, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

Thank you very much. I hope that I will use them wisely. SkipJohnson 10:30, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Liberal evolution

Evolution is a scientific theory, it is neither liberal nor conservative, please don't politicize science. You can put the creationist view in as well but please don't present it as fact. --Canadarules 21:38, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

  • In Sabre Toothed Tiger I don't see any difference between either of your versions. So don't understand the argument here. But I do understand that an Admin will be deciding who is blocked, and for what. So far I don't see anything done by either of you to warrant a block. Now you two go and place nice! --şŷŝôρ-₮K/Ṣρёаќǃ 23:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Likely Vandal?

  • We do not block people here for "likely" unless their created user name is something pretty blatant. Perhaps you can contact me, and discuss what policy is, rather than creating all this unblocking work for me? Thanks. --şŷŝôρ-₮K/Ṣρёаќǃ 00:31, 13 October 2007 (EDT)


I did do the removal of the article, as I felt advertised and supported anarchy. But, under the assumption that I am wrong for doing so (and don't worry about my feelings here; I could indeed be wrong), please discuss it with Aschlafly. If he says it's OK, then it will be restored immediately. Karajou 04:26, 16 January 2008 (EST)

It's OK and I've restored it. Thanks for your concern, Karajou.--Aschlafly 18:34, 16 January 2008 (EST)


You reverted all my work. I do not understand why. And you left my merged to Daniel Pipes. What are you trying to do? --Ed Poor Talk 16:31, 18 January 2008 (EST)


unlocked for 24 hours Geo.Complain! 21:35, 18 January 2008 (EST)


I'm not entirely sure on that last edit - hence the question mark; but I think that the point being made is pro-life vs pro-choice, which wouldn't really involve the financial aspects so much as the ethical/moral position. Open to discussion though. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 17:10, 22 January 2008 (EST)

wp deletions

I am interested. Shoot me an email. SW·· 00:19, 23 January 2008 (EST)